Reciprocal versus non-reciprocal assessment of knee flexors and 1 extensors in concentric actions using the CON-TREX multi-joint 2 isokinetic dynamometer

A reliability study

Alex Bliss, Jeanne Dekerle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Knee flexor and extensor muscular assessment via isokinetic dynamometry is common practice and established in the research literature. However, reporting assessment methodology regarding reciprocal and non-reciprocal movements is often vague or absent. Such methodological issues are crucial for accurate assessments. Therefore, knee extensor and flexor peak moment using either reciprocal movement or non-reciprocal modalities was assessed. Fifteen participants performed 3 blocks of 5 concentric muscle actions at three angular velocities [1: non-reciprocal (maximal active flexion followed by passive extension); B2: reciprocal (maximal active extension followed by maximal active flexion); B3 non-reciprocal (maximal active extension followed by passive flexion)]. ANOVA revealed statistically significant within-subject modality effects for peak knee extensor moment and flexor velocity and modality differences (P<0.05). Reciprocal and non-reciprocal assessments give significantly different results, with non-reciprocal giving higher peak moments. Reporting which modality is used is crucial to allow for greater clarity for the reader and practitioner.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Knee
Joints
Analysis of Variance
Muscles
Research

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science on 28/11/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1091367X.2018.1550087

Keywords

  • Isokinetic
  • peak moment
  • quadriceps
  • hamstrings
  • muscular assessment

Cite this

@article{5de6874ef1a94fa6abf65861b04ef070,
title = "Reciprocal versus non-reciprocal assessment of knee flexors and 1 extensors in concentric actions using the CON-TREX multi-joint 2 isokinetic dynamometer: A reliability study",
abstract = "Knee flexor and extensor muscular assessment via isokinetic dynamometry is common practice and established in the research literature. However, reporting assessment methodology regarding reciprocal and non-reciprocal movements is often vague or absent. Such methodological issues are crucial for accurate assessments. Therefore, knee extensor and flexor peak moment using either reciprocal movement or non-reciprocal modalities was assessed. Fifteen participants performed 3 blocks of 5 concentric muscle actions at three angular velocities [1: non-reciprocal (maximal active flexion followed by passive extension); B2: reciprocal (maximal active extension followed by maximal active flexion); B3 non-reciprocal (maximal active extension followed by passive flexion)]. ANOVA revealed statistically significant within-subject modality effects for peak knee extensor moment and flexor velocity and modality differences (P<0.05). Reciprocal and non-reciprocal assessments give significantly different results, with non-reciprocal giving higher peak moments. Reporting which modality is used is crucial to allow for greater clarity for the reader and practitioner.",
keywords = "Isokinetic, peak moment, quadriceps, hamstrings, muscular assessment",
author = "Alex Bliss and Jeanne Dekerle",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science on 28/11/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1091367X.2018.1550087",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/1091367X.2018.1550087",
language = "English",
journal = "Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science",
issn = "1091-367X",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reciprocal versus non-reciprocal assessment of knee flexors and 1 extensors in concentric actions using the CON-TREX multi-joint 2 isokinetic dynamometer

T2 - A reliability study

AU - Bliss, Alex

AU - Dekerle, Jeanne

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science on 28/11/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1091367X.2018.1550087

PY - 2018/11/28

Y1 - 2018/11/28

N2 - Knee flexor and extensor muscular assessment via isokinetic dynamometry is common practice and established in the research literature. However, reporting assessment methodology regarding reciprocal and non-reciprocal movements is often vague or absent. Such methodological issues are crucial for accurate assessments. Therefore, knee extensor and flexor peak moment using either reciprocal movement or non-reciprocal modalities was assessed. Fifteen participants performed 3 blocks of 5 concentric muscle actions at three angular velocities [1: non-reciprocal (maximal active flexion followed by passive extension); B2: reciprocal (maximal active extension followed by maximal active flexion); B3 non-reciprocal (maximal active extension followed by passive flexion)]. ANOVA revealed statistically significant within-subject modality effects for peak knee extensor moment and flexor velocity and modality differences (P<0.05). Reciprocal and non-reciprocal assessments give significantly different results, with non-reciprocal giving higher peak moments. Reporting which modality is used is crucial to allow for greater clarity for the reader and practitioner.

AB - Knee flexor and extensor muscular assessment via isokinetic dynamometry is common practice and established in the research literature. However, reporting assessment methodology regarding reciprocal and non-reciprocal movements is often vague or absent. Such methodological issues are crucial for accurate assessments. Therefore, knee extensor and flexor peak moment using either reciprocal movement or non-reciprocal modalities was assessed. Fifteen participants performed 3 blocks of 5 concentric muscle actions at three angular velocities [1: non-reciprocal (maximal active flexion followed by passive extension); B2: reciprocal (maximal active extension followed by maximal active flexion); B3 non-reciprocal (maximal active extension followed by passive flexion)]. ANOVA revealed statistically significant within-subject modality effects for peak knee extensor moment and flexor velocity and modality differences (P<0.05). Reciprocal and non-reciprocal assessments give significantly different results, with non-reciprocal giving higher peak moments. Reporting which modality is used is crucial to allow for greater clarity for the reader and practitioner.

KW - Isokinetic

KW - peak moment

KW - quadriceps

KW - hamstrings

KW - muscular assessment

U2 - 10.1080/1091367X.2018.1550087

DO - 10.1080/1091367X.2018.1550087

M3 - Article

JO - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

JF - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

SN - 1091-367X

ER -