Abstract
Following a brief discussion of the meanings of constructivism an argument is made to the effect that Q methodology is a constructivist methodology in a sense that is compatible with the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. A brief comparison of the ideas of Stephenson and Whitehead is followed by a section outlining Whitehead’s notion of the ‘actual occasion’ as the core of a constructivist approach to nature. It is argued that a comparable conception of the event is at play in Stephenson’s thinking about Q methodology, and that this is key to understanding the quantum theoretical aspects of Q. Some of the procedures of Q methodology are then interpreted in the light of this conception. The conclusion uses the distinction between experience and expression to integregate the ideas of Stephenson, Whitehead and William James into a novel synthesis of potential use to Q methodologists.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 46-69 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Operant Subjectivity: The International Journal of Q Methodology |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1-3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Keywords
- Q methodology
- social constructionism
- constructivism