Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology

Paul Stenner, D. Cooper, S. Skevington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is presented as a largely subjective construct of increasing importance in health discourse and practice. Key difficulties with the assessment and measurement of quality of life (QOL) are discussed. A Q methodological investigation of subjective constructions of health-related QOL is then reported using importance items derived from studies of the WHOQOL. Eight factors emerged from a factor analysis of the Q sorts of 90 healthy participants, each corresponding to a distinct construction of the meaning and relevance of QOL. The factors are interpreted and discussed under the following headings: ‘Happy families, ‘Stand on my own two feet’, ‘Emotional independence’, ‘Just do it!’, ‘Life as a positive challenge’, ‘In God we trust’, ‘Staying healthy enough to bring home the bacon’ and ‘You can’t choose your family’. This diversity of views has implications for QOL testing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2161-2172
Number of pages12
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume57
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

quality of life
methodology
health
god
factor analysis
discourse

Keywords

  • Quality of life
  • Health
  • WHOQOL
  • Q methodology
  • Qualitative

Cite this

@article{f99471ddd03e4f23b294b9ab85996a22,
title = "Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology",
abstract = "Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is presented as a largely subjective construct of increasing importance in health discourse and practice. Key difficulties with the assessment and measurement of quality of life (QOL) are discussed. A Q methodological investigation of subjective constructions of health-related QOL is then reported using importance items derived from studies of the WHOQOL. Eight factors emerged from a factor analysis of the Q sorts of 90 healthy participants, each corresponding to a distinct construction of the meaning and relevance of QOL. The factors are interpreted and discussed under the following headings: ‘Happy families, ‘Stand on my own two feet’, ‘Emotional independence’, ‘Just do it!’, ‘Life as a positive challenge’, ‘In God we trust’, ‘Staying healthy enough to bring home the bacon’ and ‘You can’t choose your family’. This diversity of views has implications for QOL testing.",
keywords = "Quality of life, Health, WHOQOL, Q methodology, Qualitative",
author = "Paul Stenner and D. Cooper and S. Skevington",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00070-4",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "2161--2172",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
number = "11",

}

Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology. / Stenner, Paul; Cooper, D.; Skevington, S.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 57, No. 11, 12.2003, p. 2161-2172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology

AU - Stenner, Paul

AU - Cooper, D.

AU - Skevington, S.

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is presented as a largely subjective construct of increasing importance in health discourse and practice. Key difficulties with the assessment and measurement of quality of life (QOL) are discussed. A Q methodological investigation of subjective constructions of health-related QOL is then reported using importance items derived from studies of the WHOQOL. Eight factors emerged from a factor analysis of the Q sorts of 90 healthy participants, each corresponding to a distinct construction of the meaning and relevance of QOL. The factors are interpreted and discussed under the following headings: ‘Happy families, ‘Stand on my own two feet’, ‘Emotional independence’, ‘Just do it!’, ‘Life as a positive challenge’, ‘In God we trust’, ‘Staying healthy enough to bring home the bacon’ and ‘You can’t choose your family’. This diversity of views has implications for QOL testing.

AB - Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is presented as a largely subjective construct of increasing importance in health discourse and practice. Key difficulties with the assessment and measurement of quality of life (QOL) are discussed. A Q methodological investigation of subjective constructions of health-related QOL is then reported using importance items derived from studies of the WHOQOL. Eight factors emerged from a factor analysis of the Q sorts of 90 healthy participants, each corresponding to a distinct construction of the meaning and relevance of QOL. The factors are interpreted and discussed under the following headings: ‘Happy families, ‘Stand on my own two feet’, ‘Emotional independence’, ‘Just do it!’, ‘Life as a positive challenge’, ‘In God we trust’, ‘Staying healthy enough to bring home the bacon’ and ‘You can’t choose your family’. This diversity of views has implications for QOL testing.

KW - Quality of life

KW - Health

KW - WHOQOL

KW - Q methodology

KW - Qualitative

U2 - 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00070-4

DO - 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00070-4

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 2161

EP - 2172

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 11

ER -