Problematising Media Language

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearch

Abstract

“What we have here is theory as a set of instrumental ‘facts’, not as a body of ideas to be used and challenged” (Buckingham 2017). This workshop will outline the ideas of three theorists currently taught in school. I will reflect on my experience of teaching these concepts to undergraduates and ask A-Level and BTEC teachers to comment on their experience. Discussing Barthes, Levi-Strauss and Baudrillard, I aim to show how their ideas can be addressed in a way that is clear for students to understand, while retaining the essential element of all of those thinkers’ position: that the truth and importance of any statement or means of analysis is always constructed, it is not natural or given; not “a set of instrumental facts”. Finally we will discuss the feasibility of supporting students in taking the critical position demanded by these theories, in the context of an assessment structure that requires students to instrumentalise their knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019
EventSussex Media Teachers Conference - University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
Duration: 5 Jul 20195 Jul 2019

Conference

ConferenceSussex Media Teachers Conference
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityBrighton
Period5/07/195/07/19

Fingerprint

language
student
experience
Teaching
teacher
school

Keywords

  • media
  • media pedagogy
  • pedagogy
  • teaching
  • Teaching and learning

Cite this

Burns, R. (2019). Problematising Media Language. Abstract from Sussex Media Teachers Conference, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Burns, Ryan. / Problematising Media Language. Abstract from Sussex Media Teachers Conference, Brighton, United Kingdom.
@conference{074d1e5a3dbf4a33883de93626990f37,
title = "Problematising Media Language",
abstract = "“What we have here is theory as a set of instrumental ‘facts’, not as a body of ideas to be used and challenged” (Buckingham 2017). This workshop will outline the ideas of three theorists currently taught in school. I will reflect on my experience of teaching these concepts to undergraduates and ask A-Level and BTEC teachers to comment on their experience. Discussing Barthes, Levi-Strauss and Baudrillard, I aim to show how their ideas can be addressed in a way that is clear for students to understand, while retaining the essential element of all of those thinkers’ position: that the truth and importance of any statement or means of analysis is always constructed, it is not natural or given; not “a set of instrumental facts”. Finally we will discuss the feasibility of supporting students in taking the critical position demanded by these theories, in the context of an assessment structure that requires students to instrumentalise their knowledge.",
keywords = "media, media pedagogy, pedagogy, teaching, Teaching and learning",
author = "Ryan Burns",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
language = "English",
note = "Sussex Media Teachers Conference ; Conference date: 05-07-2019 Through 05-07-2019",

}

Burns, R 2019, 'Problematising Media Language' Sussex Media Teachers Conference, Brighton, United Kingdom, 5/07/19 - 5/07/19, .

Problematising Media Language. / Burns, Ryan.

2019. Abstract from Sussex Media Teachers Conference, Brighton, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearch

TY - CONF

T1 - Problematising Media Language

AU - Burns, Ryan

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - “What we have here is theory as a set of instrumental ‘facts’, not as a body of ideas to be used and challenged” (Buckingham 2017). This workshop will outline the ideas of three theorists currently taught in school. I will reflect on my experience of teaching these concepts to undergraduates and ask A-Level and BTEC teachers to comment on their experience. Discussing Barthes, Levi-Strauss and Baudrillard, I aim to show how their ideas can be addressed in a way that is clear for students to understand, while retaining the essential element of all of those thinkers’ position: that the truth and importance of any statement or means of analysis is always constructed, it is not natural or given; not “a set of instrumental facts”. Finally we will discuss the feasibility of supporting students in taking the critical position demanded by these theories, in the context of an assessment structure that requires students to instrumentalise their knowledge.

AB - “What we have here is theory as a set of instrumental ‘facts’, not as a body of ideas to be used and challenged” (Buckingham 2017). This workshop will outline the ideas of three theorists currently taught in school. I will reflect on my experience of teaching these concepts to undergraduates and ask A-Level and BTEC teachers to comment on their experience. Discussing Barthes, Levi-Strauss and Baudrillard, I aim to show how their ideas can be addressed in a way that is clear for students to understand, while retaining the essential element of all of those thinkers’ position: that the truth and importance of any statement or means of analysis is always constructed, it is not natural or given; not “a set of instrumental facts”. Finally we will discuss the feasibility of supporting students in taking the critical position demanded by these theories, in the context of an assessment structure that requires students to instrumentalise their knowledge.

KW - media

KW - media pedagogy

KW - pedagogy

KW - teaching

KW - Teaching and learning

M3 - Abstract

ER -

Burns R. Problematising Media Language. 2019. Abstract from Sussex Media Teachers Conference, Brighton, United Kingdom.