Potentiality, Sovereignty and Bare Life: A critical reading of Giorgio Agamben

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article presents a critical account of Agamben’s understanding of the logic of sovereignty and of the notion bare life, particularly Agamben’s approach to the paradox of sovereignty and its relation to Aristotle’s metaphysical category of po- tentiality. With regards to bare life, it brings together an analysis of the figure of the homo sacer with an account of Agamben’s use of paradigms as methodological tools. The first part of the paper argues that Agamben ontologises sovereignty by dramatising the paradox of its structure as im-potentiality. The second part claims that even though an account of Agamben’s methodology serves to respond to the different critiques that his notion of bare life has raised, Agamben’s notions of sov- ereignty and of bare life ultimately rely on Schmitt’s decisionism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-99
Number of pages20
JournalIdeas y Valores
Volume63
Issue number156
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Giorgio Agamben
Bare Life
Potentiality
Sovereignty
Paradox
Paradigm
Methodology
Logic
Homo Sacer
Metaphysical
Decisionism

Cite this

@article{65f29ebb6ea542d4b3bea4f40225a72b,
title = "Potentiality, Sovereignty and Bare Life: A critical reading of Giorgio Agamben",
abstract = "This article presents a critical account of Agamben’s understanding of the logic of sovereignty and of the notion bare life, particularly Agamben’s approach to the paradox of sovereignty and its relation to Aristotle’s metaphysical category of po- tentiality. With regards to bare life, it brings together an analysis of the figure of the homo sacer with an account of Agamben’s use of paradigms as methodological tools. The first part of the paper argues that Agamben ontologises sovereignty by dramatising the paradox of its structure as im-potentiality. The second part claims that even though an account of Agamben’s methodology serves to respond to the different critiques that his notion of bare life has raised, Agamben’s notions of sov- ereignty and of bare life ultimately rely on Schmitt’s decisionism.",
author = "{Primera Villamizar}, German",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
doi = "10.15446/ideasyvalores.v63n156.38326",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "79--99",
journal = "Ideas y Valores",
issn = "0120-0062",
number = "156",

}

Potentiality, Sovereignty and Bare Life : A critical reading of Giorgio Agamben. / Primera Villamizar, German.

In: Ideas y Valores , Vol. 63, No. 156, 12.2014, p. 79-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potentiality, Sovereignty and Bare Life

T2 - A critical reading of Giorgio Agamben

AU - Primera Villamizar, German

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - This article presents a critical account of Agamben’s understanding of the logic of sovereignty and of the notion bare life, particularly Agamben’s approach to the paradox of sovereignty and its relation to Aristotle’s metaphysical category of po- tentiality. With regards to bare life, it brings together an analysis of the figure of the homo sacer with an account of Agamben’s use of paradigms as methodological tools. The first part of the paper argues that Agamben ontologises sovereignty by dramatising the paradox of its structure as im-potentiality. The second part claims that even though an account of Agamben’s methodology serves to respond to the different critiques that his notion of bare life has raised, Agamben’s notions of sov- ereignty and of bare life ultimately rely on Schmitt’s decisionism.

AB - This article presents a critical account of Agamben’s understanding of the logic of sovereignty and of the notion bare life, particularly Agamben’s approach to the paradox of sovereignty and its relation to Aristotle’s metaphysical category of po- tentiality. With regards to bare life, it brings together an analysis of the figure of the homo sacer with an account of Agamben’s use of paradigms as methodological tools. The first part of the paper argues that Agamben ontologises sovereignty by dramatising the paradox of its structure as im-potentiality. The second part claims that even though an account of Agamben’s methodology serves to respond to the different critiques that his notion of bare life has raised, Agamben’s notions of sov- ereignty and of bare life ultimately rely on Schmitt’s decisionism.

U2 - 10.15446/ideasyvalores.v63n156.38326

DO - 10.15446/ideasyvalores.v63n156.38326

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 79

EP - 99

JO - Ideas y Valores

JF - Ideas y Valores

SN - 0120-0062

IS - 156

ER -