Abstract
This study investigated victim culpability, credibility, and assault severity in a hypothetical sexual abuse case. A 2 (respondent gender) × 3 (victim age) × 3 (perpetrator type) between-subjects design was employed. Members (391) of the U.K. general public read the depiction of a female child assaulted by an adult male perpetrator. Respondents then completed an attributions questionnaire. Findings showed that male respondents were less positive toward victims and considered the victim less credible than female respondents. Younger victims (aged five years) were considered more credible than older children (aged 15 years). Victims of strangers were considered more positively and more credible than victims of someone known to them (their father or a family friend). Suggestions for future work are proposed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 78-92 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment, & Program Innovations for Victims, Survivors, & Offenders |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 4 Feb 2009 |
Keywords
- victim credibility
- victimization
- assault severity
- childhood sexual abuse
- victim-perpetrator relationship
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Age Factors
- Aged
- Child Abuse, Sexual
- Crime Victims
- Empathy
- Female
- Guilt
- Humans
- Interpersonal Relations
- Judgment
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Public Opinion
- Social Perception
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Survivors
- Young Adult
- Child Abuse
- Perpetrators
- Victimization
- Credibility
- Sexual Abuse