Outer space and new frontiers to environmental imaginations

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter explores the importance and usefulness of considering outer space as an environment from the perspective of environmental sociology. It identifies that, whilst 'outer space' may imply a space outside of the human environment, global society is increasingly dependent on space technology. Although our notions of 'the environment' are often limited to terrestrial natures, this chapter follows other recent arguments in advocating a closer examination of how different 'environments' are being produced in outer space. The chapter focusses on three different, though inter-related, ways in which the outer space environment is materially, discursively, and imaginately produced. First, it considers outer space as an 'abundant' environment, in which outer space is seen as an infinite supply of resources for economic expansion. Second, it considers outer space as a 'risk' environment crowded with debris that threatens the sustainability of Earth's orbit in particular. Third, it considers outer space as a 'wilderness' environment to be valued either because of its intrinsic worth or because of the role it can play in addressing human destructiveness. The chapter concludes by expressing hope that the lessons learnt from terrestrial environmental sociology can improve our relationship with the space environment in pivotal times.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology
    EditorsKatharine Legun, Julie Keller, Michael Bell, Michael Carolan
    Place of PublicationCambridge
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Chapter15
    Pages243-61
    Volume1
    ISBN (Electronic)9781108554510
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Outer space and new frontiers to environmental imaginations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this