Outdoor recreation and participative democracy in England and Wales

Neil Ravenscroft, Nigel Curry, Susan Markwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 places a duty on highways and national park authorities to establish local access forums (LAFs), to advise on the improvement of public access to land for the purposes of open air recreation and enjoyment. This paper examines these proposals in the context of recent academic and political debates about deliberative democracy, and empirical research on the nature and practice of existing access liaison groups and forums. While demonstrating that the proposed LAFs are consistent with contemporary constructs of participative, if not deliberative democracy, the paper argues that most existing groups and forums fall short of this ideal, in a number of significant respects. The paper proceeds to discuss the extent to which the draft regulations for LAFs in England and Wales address these issues, and concludes by questioning the extent to which such consultative arrangements can contribute to new forms of local governance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)715-734
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of environmental planning and management
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2002

Fingerprint

deliberative democracy
recreation
democracy
open channel
national park
empirical research
Group
air
act
governance
regulation

Cite this

Ravenscroft, Neil ; Curry, Nigel ; Markwell, Susan. / Outdoor recreation and participative democracy in England and Wales. In: Journal of environmental planning and management. 2002 ; Vol. 45, No. 5. pp. 715-734.
@article{0d412f14534a410487f0dffe93f8df48,
title = "Outdoor recreation and participative democracy in England and Wales",
abstract = "The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 places a duty on highways and national park authorities to establish local access forums (LAFs), to advise on the improvement of public access to land for the purposes of open air recreation and enjoyment. This paper examines these proposals in the context of recent academic and political debates about deliberative democracy, and empirical research on the nature and practice of existing access liaison groups and forums. While demonstrating that the proposed LAFs are consistent with contemporary constructs of participative, if not deliberative democracy, the paper argues that most existing groups and forums fall short of this ideal, in a number of significant respects. The paper proceeds to discuss the extent to which the draft regulations for LAFs in England and Wales address these issues, and concludes by questioning the extent to which such consultative arrangements can contribute to new forms of local governance.",
author = "Neil Ravenscroft and Nigel Curry and Susan Markwell",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
doi = "doi:10.1080/0964056022000013084",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "715--734",
journal = "Journal of environmental planning and management",
issn = "1360-0559",
number = "5",

}

Outdoor recreation and participative democracy in England and Wales. / Ravenscroft, Neil; Curry, Nigel; Markwell, Susan.

In: Journal of environmental planning and management, Vol. 45, No. 5, 09.2002, p. 715-734.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outdoor recreation and participative democracy in England and Wales

AU - Ravenscroft, Neil

AU - Curry, Nigel

AU - Markwell, Susan

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 places a duty on highways and national park authorities to establish local access forums (LAFs), to advise on the improvement of public access to land for the purposes of open air recreation and enjoyment. This paper examines these proposals in the context of recent academic and political debates about deliberative democracy, and empirical research on the nature and practice of existing access liaison groups and forums. While demonstrating that the proposed LAFs are consistent with contemporary constructs of participative, if not deliberative democracy, the paper argues that most existing groups and forums fall short of this ideal, in a number of significant respects. The paper proceeds to discuss the extent to which the draft regulations for LAFs in England and Wales address these issues, and concludes by questioning the extent to which such consultative arrangements can contribute to new forms of local governance.

AB - The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 places a duty on highways and national park authorities to establish local access forums (LAFs), to advise on the improvement of public access to land for the purposes of open air recreation and enjoyment. This paper examines these proposals in the context of recent academic and political debates about deliberative democracy, and empirical research on the nature and practice of existing access liaison groups and forums. While demonstrating that the proposed LAFs are consistent with contemporary constructs of participative, if not deliberative democracy, the paper argues that most existing groups and forums fall short of this ideal, in a number of significant respects. The paper proceeds to discuss the extent to which the draft regulations for LAFs in England and Wales address these issues, and concludes by questioning the extent to which such consultative arrangements can contribute to new forms of local governance.

U2 - doi:10.1080/0964056022000013084

DO - doi:10.1080/0964056022000013084

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 715

EP - 734

JO - Journal of environmental planning and management

JF - Journal of environmental planning and management

SN - 1360-0559

IS - 5

ER -