Optimizing the real-world impact of rehabilitation reviews

increasing the relevance and usability of systematic reviews in rehabilitation

Nicola M. Kayes, Rachelle Martin, Felicity Bright, Paula Kersten, Alex Pollock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a growing portfolio of rehabilitation reviews, uptake of review findings into practice remains slow, with review findings perceived to be lacking in relevance and usability for stakeholders. Key aspects of review design, production and dissemination have been identified to contribute to this knowledge translation (KT) gap.
AIM: The aim of this study is to identify strategies relevant to rehabilitation review design, production and dissemination which have the potential to optimize uptake of review findings into practice.
RESULTS: Two strategies are discussed, drawing on case examples of existing rehabilitation reviews, including: 1) involving stakeholders in review design, production and dissemination; and 2) moving towards theory-based, mixed methods review design. The merits of these strategies are discussed with reference to the unique and specific characteristics of the rehabilitation context, where there is complexity inherent in the multiple interacting components across population, intervention, context and implementation processes.
CONCLUSIONS: Moving towards theory-based, mixed methods reviews which involve stakeholders may be a critical first step in supporting uptake of review findings into rehabilitation practice. Doing so also has the potential to support advances in knowledge and practice in rehabilitation through theory development, as well as creating the context for evidence-based practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-341
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Translational Medical Research
Evidence-Based Practice
Population

Keywords

  • Stakeholder participation
  • Systematic review
  • Translational medical research

Cite this

@article{d8902ecb6e3a4506a90fded9726a286b,
title = "Optimizing the real-world impact of rehabilitation reviews: increasing the relevance and usability of systematic reviews in rehabilitation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Despite a growing portfolio of rehabilitation reviews, uptake of review findings into practice remains slow, with review findings perceived to be lacking in relevance and usability for stakeholders. Key aspects of review design, production and dissemination have been identified to contribute to this knowledge translation (KT) gap.AIM: The aim of this study is to identify strategies relevant to rehabilitation review design, production and dissemination which have the potential to optimize uptake of review findings into practice.RESULTS: Two strategies are discussed, drawing on case examples of existing rehabilitation reviews, including: 1) involving stakeholders in review design, production and dissemination; and 2) moving towards theory-based, mixed methods review design. The merits of these strategies are discussed with reference to the unique and specific characteristics of the rehabilitation context, where there is complexity inherent in the multiple interacting components across population, intervention, context and implementation processes.CONCLUSIONS: Moving towards theory-based, mixed methods reviews which involve stakeholders may be a critical first step in supporting uptake of review findings into rehabilitation practice. Doing so also has the potential to support advances in knowledge and practice in rehabilitation through theory development, as well as creating the context for evidence-based practice.",
keywords = "Stakeholder participation, Systematic review, Translational medical research",
author = "Kayes, {Nicola M.} and Rachelle Martin and Felicity Bright and Paula Kersten and Alex Pollock",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05793-9",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "331--341",
journal = "European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine",
number = "3",

}

Optimizing the real-world impact of rehabilitation reviews : increasing the relevance and usability of systematic reviews in rehabilitation. / Kayes, Nicola M.; Martin, Rachelle; Bright, Felicity; Kersten, Paula; Pollock, Alex.

In: European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 55, No. 3, 30.06.2019, p. 331-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing the real-world impact of rehabilitation reviews

T2 - increasing the relevance and usability of systematic reviews in rehabilitation

AU - Kayes, Nicola M.

AU - Martin, Rachelle

AU - Bright, Felicity

AU - Kersten, Paula

AU - Pollock, Alex

PY - 2019/6/30

Y1 - 2019/6/30

N2 - BACKGROUND: Despite a growing portfolio of rehabilitation reviews, uptake of review findings into practice remains slow, with review findings perceived to be lacking in relevance and usability for stakeholders. Key aspects of review design, production and dissemination have been identified to contribute to this knowledge translation (KT) gap.AIM: The aim of this study is to identify strategies relevant to rehabilitation review design, production and dissemination which have the potential to optimize uptake of review findings into practice.RESULTS: Two strategies are discussed, drawing on case examples of existing rehabilitation reviews, including: 1) involving stakeholders in review design, production and dissemination; and 2) moving towards theory-based, mixed methods review design. The merits of these strategies are discussed with reference to the unique and specific characteristics of the rehabilitation context, where there is complexity inherent in the multiple interacting components across population, intervention, context and implementation processes.CONCLUSIONS: Moving towards theory-based, mixed methods reviews which involve stakeholders may be a critical first step in supporting uptake of review findings into rehabilitation practice. Doing so also has the potential to support advances in knowledge and practice in rehabilitation through theory development, as well as creating the context for evidence-based practice.

AB - BACKGROUND: Despite a growing portfolio of rehabilitation reviews, uptake of review findings into practice remains slow, with review findings perceived to be lacking in relevance and usability for stakeholders. Key aspects of review design, production and dissemination have been identified to contribute to this knowledge translation (KT) gap.AIM: The aim of this study is to identify strategies relevant to rehabilitation review design, production and dissemination which have the potential to optimize uptake of review findings into practice.RESULTS: Two strategies are discussed, drawing on case examples of existing rehabilitation reviews, including: 1) involving stakeholders in review design, production and dissemination; and 2) moving towards theory-based, mixed methods review design. The merits of these strategies are discussed with reference to the unique and specific characteristics of the rehabilitation context, where there is complexity inherent in the multiple interacting components across population, intervention, context and implementation processes.CONCLUSIONS: Moving towards theory-based, mixed methods reviews which involve stakeholders may be a critical first step in supporting uptake of review findings into rehabilitation practice. Doing so also has the potential to support advances in knowledge and practice in rehabilitation through theory development, as well as creating the context for evidence-based practice.

KW - Stakeholder participation

KW - Systematic review

KW - Translational medical research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067266452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05793-9

DO - 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05793-9

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 331

EP - 341

JO - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

IS - 3

ER -