Nikos Kazantzakis’s phenomenology and its relevance to the study of organizations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines Morgan’s theorization of images of organizations
from a phenomenological perspective using the works of Nikos
Kazantzakis. The paper argues that Morgan’s representation of metaphors
currently favours an entitative interpretation of influence and control,
undermining novel processes deeply embedded within existential
nuances situated in the realm of the human experience. By focusing on
Kazantzakis’s phenomenology, the paper proposes that a theorization of
transitionality demonstrates that a content–process struggle is rooted
within a permanence–temporality struggle constantly conditioned against
individuals’ transitoriness of existence. Relatedness, affirmation and
temporality represent three interdependent process states and each
exposes self-existential tensions that regulate the directionality of one’s
transitions. Such transitions are thought to challenge the entitative form
with which organizations are portrayed in the individual. The paper shows
that a conceptualization of transitionality through Kazantzakis provides a
new scope for understanding the structure of movements situated in the
self and for customizing the forces of permanence and temporality.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCulture and Organization
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

organization of studies
phenomenology
interpretation
experience

Bibliographical note

“This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Culture and Organization on 24/01/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14759551.2019.1570195

Keywords

  • Morgan
  • Nikos Kazantzakis
  • images
  • metaphors
  • phenomenology
  • process

Cite this

@article{1cf761e052d04463955bc594bffb3809,
title = "Nikos Kazantzakis’s phenomenology and its relevance to the study of organizations",
abstract = "This paper examines Morgan’s theorization of images of organizationsfrom a phenomenological perspective using the works of NikosKazantzakis. The paper argues that Morgan’s representation of metaphorscurrently favours an entitative interpretation of influence and control,undermining novel processes deeply embedded within existentialnuances situated in the realm of the human experience. By focusing onKazantzakis’s phenomenology, the paper proposes that a theorization oftransitionality demonstrates that a content–process struggle is rootedwithin a permanence–temporality struggle constantly conditioned againstindividuals’ transitoriness of existence. Relatedness, affirmation andtemporality represent three interdependent process states and eachexposes self-existential tensions that regulate the directionality of one’stransitions. Such transitions are thought to challenge the entitative formwith which organizations are portrayed in the individual. The paper showsthat a conceptualization of transitionality through Kazantzakis provides anew scope for understanding the structure of movements situated in theself and for customizing the forces of permanence and temporality.",
keywords = "Morgan, Nikos Kazantzakis, images, metaphors, phenomenology, process",
author = "Stephanos Avakian",
note = "“This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Culture and Organization on 24/01/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14759551.2019.1570195",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/14759551.2019.1570195",
language = "English",
journal = "Culture and Organization",
issn = "1475-9551",

}

Nikos Kazantzakis’s phenomenology and its relevance to the study of organizations. / Avakian, Stephanos.

In: Culture and Organization, 24.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nikos Kazantzakis’s phenomenology and its relevance to the study of organizations

AU - Avakian, Stephanos

N1 - “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Culture and Organization on 24/01/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14759551.2019.1570195

PY - 2019/1/24

Y1 - 2019/1/24

N2 - This paper examines Morgan’s theorization of images of organizationsfrom a phenomenological perspective using the works of NikosKazantzakis. The paper argues that Morgan’s representation of metaphorscurrently favours an entitative interpretation of influence and control,undermining novel processes deeply embedded within existentialnuances situated in the realm of the human experience. By focusing onKazantzakis’s phenomenology, the paper proposes that a theorization oftransitionality demonstrates that a content–process struggle is rootedwithin a permanence–temporality struggle constantly conditioned againstindividuals’ transitoriness of existence. Relatedness, affirmation andtemporality represent three interdependent process states and eachexposes self-existential tensions that regulate the directionality of one’stransitions. Such transitions are thought to challenge the entitative formwith which organizations are portrayed in the individual. The paper showsthat a conceptualization of transitionality through Kazantzakis provides anew scope for understanding the structure of movements situated in theself and for customizing the forces of permanence and temporality.

AB - This paper examines Morgan’s theorization of images of organizationsfrom a phenomenological perspective using the works of NikosKazantzakis. The paper argues that Morgan’s representation of metaphorscurrently favours an entitative interpretation of influence and control,undermining novel processes deeply embedded within existentialnuances situated in the realm of the human experience. By focusing onKazantzakis’s phenomenology, the paper proposes that a theorization oftransitionality demonstrates that a content–process struggle is rootedwithin a permanence–temporality struggle constantly conditioned againstindividuals’ transitoriness of existence. Relatedness, affirmation andtemporality represent three interdependent process states and eachexposes self-existential tensions that regulate the directionality of one’stransitions. Such transitions are thought to challenge the entitative formwith which organizations are portrayed in the individual. The paper showsthat a conceptualization of transitionality through Kazantzakis provides anew scope for understanding the structure of movements situated in theself and for customizing the forces of permanence and temporality.

KW - Morgan

KW - Nikos Kazantzakis

KW - images

KW - metaphors

KW - phenomenology

KW - process

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060714605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14759551.2019.1570195

DO - 10.1080/14759551.2019.1570195

M3 - Article

JO - Culture and Organization

JF - Culture and Organization

SN - 1475-9551

ER -