Negotiations and fieldworkings: friendship and feminist research

Katherine Browne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper explores the micro-level operations of power where researchers speak within, rather than across, worlds. It seeks to augment geographical feminist research literature that discusses interpersonal power relations in research spaces by exploring the complexities of ‘sameness’ between participants and researchers on the basis of sexuality and friendships. I argue for an understanding of power relations in the research process (recruiting, research gathering/forming, feedback and writing up) as negotiable if not necessarily negotiated. This is premised on an understanding of research (and research fields) as constituted through performativities and intersubjectivities between the researcher and participants, what the paper calls fieldworkings. Research fields as formed through fieldworkings include, but extend beyond, recognised research fields/spaces, in this case focus groups, interviews and coupled interviews, to wider social and personal relations including friendships. Thus, the paper concludes by contending that rather than moving beyond research relations, dialogues regarding fieldworkings as ongoing and negotiable could be productive.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-146
Number of pages15
JournalACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies
Volume2
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

field research
friendship
intersubjectivity
interview
research process
micro level
sexuality
dialogue
Group

Cite this

@article{4a1fcaaefb0f44b4a028a6bcb88004bd,
title = "Negotiations and fieldworkings: friendship and feminist research",
abstract = "This paper explores the micro-level operations of power where researchers speak within, rather than across, worlds. It seeks to augment geographical feminist research literature that discusses interpersonal power relations in research spaces by exploring the complexities of ‘sameness’ between participants and researchers on the basis of sexuality and friendships. I argue for an understanding of power relations in the research process (recruiting, research gathering/forming, feedback and writing up) as negotiable if not necessarily negotiated. This is premised on an understanding of research (and research fields) as constituted through performativities and intersubjectivities between the researcher and participants, what the paper calls fieldworkings. Research fields as formed through fieldworkings include, but extend beyond, recognised research fields/spaces, in this case focus groups, interviews and coupled interviews, to wider social and personal relations including friendships. Thus, the paper concludes by contending that rather than moving beyond research relations, dialogues regarding fieldworkings as ongoing and negotiable could be productive.",
author = "Katherine Browne",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "132--146",
journal = "ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies",
issn = "1492-9732",
number = "2",

}

Negotiations and fieldworkings: friendship and feminist research. / Browne, Katherine.

In: ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003, p. 132-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negotiations and fieldworkings: friendship and feminist research

AU - Browne, Katherine

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This paper explores the micro-level operations of power where researchers speak within, rather than across, worlds. It seeks to augment geographical feminist research literature that discusses interpersonal power relations in research spaces by exploring the complexities of ‘sameness’ between participants and researchers on the basis of sexuality and friendships. I argue for an understanding of power relations in the research process (recruiting, research gathering/forming, feedback and writing up) as negotiable if not necessarily negotiated. This is premised on an understanding of research (and research fields) as constituted through performativities and intersubjectivities between the researcher and participants, what the paper calls fieldworkings. Research fields as formed through fieldworkings include, but extend beyond, recognised research fields/spaces, in this case focus groups, interviews and coupled interviews, to wider social and personal relations including friendships. Thus, the paper concludes by contending that rather than moving beyond research relations, dialogues regarding fieldworkings as ongoing and negotiable could be productive.

AB - This paper explores the micro-level operations of power where researchers speak within, rather than across, worlds. It seeks to augment geographical feminist research literature that discusses interpersonal power relations in research spaces by exploring the complexities of ‘sameness’ between participants and researchers on the basis of sexuality and friendships. I argue for an understanding of power relations in the research process (recruiting, research gathering/forming, feedback and writing up) as negotiable if not necessarily negotiated. This is premised on an understanding of research (and research fields) as constituted through performativities and intersubjectivities between the researcher and participants, what the paper calls fieldworkings. Research fields as formed through fieldworkings include, but extend beyond, recognised research fields/spaces, in this case focus groups, interviews and coupled interviews, to wider social and personal relations including friendships. Thus, the paper concludes by contending that rather than moving beyond research relations, dialogues regarding fieldworkings as ongoing and negotiable could be productive.

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 132

EP - 146

JO - ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies

JF - ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies

SN - 1492-9732

IS - 2

ER -