Nature and self: an ambivalent attachment?

Martin Jordan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article explores how our attachment to nature is formed in our early love relationships and draws on ideas from psychodynamic theory and contemporary research in developmental psychology to explore the development of the self, the importance of attachment, how “splits” have formed between self and nature as a protection against vulnerability, and potential ways forward in dealing with this. The article argues that at the heart of our current ecological crisis are fundamental problems of dependency and vulnerability, resulting for many in an ambivalent attachment to nature. Understanding the complex ways in which humans react to intimacy as a result of early attachment is central to the project of ecopsychology and the ways in which people can help understand and shift the nature of their relationships, both to the planet and with each other. The article concludes by looking at evidence for a securely attached “ecological self” and the potential for developmental models to promote this.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-31
Number of pages6
JournalEcopsychology
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2009

Fingerprint

vulnerability
environment crisis
developmental psychology
intimacy
love
evidence

Bibliographical note

This is a copy of an article published in Ecopsychology © 2009 [copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.]; Ecopsychology is available online at: http://online.liebertpub.com.

Cite this

Jordan, Martin. / Nature and self: an ambivalent attachment?. In: Ecopsychology. 2009 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 26-31.
@article{4287428ed0c842f2871374f487609cc5,
title = "Nature and self: an ambivalent attachment?",
abstract = "This article explores how our attachment to nature is formed in our early love relationships and draws on ideas from psychodynamic theory and contemporary research in developmental psychology to explore the development of the self, the importance of attachment, how “splits” have formed between self and nature as a protection against vulnerability, and potential ways forward in dealing with this. The article argues that at the heart of our current ecological crisis are fundamental problems of dependency and vulnerability, resulting for many in an ambivalent attachment to nature. Understanding the complex ways in which humans react to intimacy as a result of early attachment is central to the project of ecopsychology and the ways in which people can help understand and shift the nature of their relationships, both to the planet and with each other. The article concludes by looking at evidence for a securely attached “ecological self” and the potential for developmental models to promote this.",
author = "Martin Jordan",
note = "This is a copy of an article published in Ecopsychology {\circledC} 2009 [copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.]; Ecopsychology is available online at: http://online.liebertpub.com.",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/eco.2008.0003",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "26--31",
journal = "Ecopsychology",
issn = "1942-9347",
number = "1",

}

Nature and self: an ambivalent attachment? / Jordan, Martin.

In: Ecopsychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.03.2009, p. 26-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nature and self: an ambivalent attachment?

AU - Jordan, Martin

N1 - This is a copy of an article published in Ecopsychology © 2009 [copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.]; Ecopsychology is available online at: http://online.liebertpub.com.

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - This article explores how our attachment to nature is formed in our early love relationships and draws on ideas from psychodynamic theory and contemporary research in developmental psychology to explore the development of the self, the importance of attachment, how “splits” have formed between self and nature as a protection against vulnerability, and potential ways forward in dealing with this. The article argues that at the heart of our current ecological crisis are fundamental problems of dependency and vulnerability, resulting for many in an ambivalent attachment to nature. Understanding the complex ways in which humans react to intimacy as a result of early attachment is central to the project of ecopsychology and the ways in which people can help understand and shift the nature of their relationships, both to the planet and with each other. The article concludes by looking at evidence for a securely attached “ecological self” and the potential for developmental models to promote this.

AB - This article explores how our attachment to nature is formed in our early love relationships and draws on ideas from psychodynamic theory and contemporary research in developmental psychology to explore the development of the self, the importance of attachment, how “splits” have formed between self and nature as a protection against vulnerability, and potential ways forward in dealing with this. The article argues that at the heart of our current ecological crisis are fundamental problems of dependency and vulnerability, resulting for many in an ambivalent attachment to nature. Understanding the complex ways in which humans react to intimacy as a result of early attachment is central to the project of ecopsychology and the ways in which people can help understand and shift the nature of their relationships, both to the planet and with each other. The article concludes by looking at evidence for a securely attached “ecological self” and the potential for developmental models to promote this.

U2 - 10.1089/eco.2008.0003

DO - 10.1089/eco.2008.0003

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 26

EP - 31

JO - Ecopsychology

JF - Ecopsychology

SN - 1942-9347

IS - 1

ER -