Narratives of nineteenth century drought in southern Africa in different historical source types

David Nash, Jørgen Klein, Georgina H. Endfield, Kathleen Pribyl, George Adamson, Stefan Grab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Single- to multiple-year drought episodes posed significant challenges for agrarian communities across southern Africa during the nineteenth century and hence are widely recorded in a variety of historical documents. However, the ways in which droughts are articulated, and the focus of individual accounts, vary considerably between different authors and historical source types. This study draws on a range of documentary source types—specifically newspapers, letters, reports and diaries—to explore the varied narratives associated with three protracted droughts (those of 1861–1863, 1876–1879 and 1895–1897) that affected large areas of the subcontinent. The analysis spans four case study areas—present day KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa), Lesotho, Malawi and the southern Kalahari (Botswana and South Africa)—which were investigated as part of different interdisciplinary projects. We explore issues common to all case study areas, including (i) how specific drought events are framed and (ii) what is and is not reported about individual droughts across different source types. We conclude that different source types in the subcontinent may be more or less appropriate for addressing the specific objectives of historical climatology, particularly in relation to historical drought. Sources such as newspapers and weather diaries are rich in qualitative and quantitative observations suitable for the reconstruction of temporal and spatial patterns of weather and climate, as well as climate-related natural disasters. In contrast, letters, reports and personal journals, especially those written by missionaries, provide additional qualitative narratives through which to investigate the vulnerability of past societies and economies to climate variations, and to explore past discourses and social representations of climate. While studies of this kind have been published for European and American source types, this is the first systematic exploration of documentary sources for the historical climatology of Africa. It should therefore provide a guide for climate history studies elsewhere in the continent, or other regions where written records are absent prior to the arrival of European colonists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-485
Number of pages19
JournalClimatic Change
Volume152
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Southern Africa
drought
nineteenth century
narrative
climate
documentary source
climatology
newspaper
weather
Lesotho
climate variation
Malawi
Botswana
missionary
natural disaster
Drought
Historical Sources
vulnerability
reconstruction
Climate

Bibliographical note

This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Climatic Change. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2352-6

Keywords

  • Historical climatology
  • climate history
  • drought
  • documentary evidence
  • southern Africa

Cite this

Nash, David ; Klein, Jørgen ; Endfield, Georgina H. ; Pribyl, Kathleen ; Adamson, George ; Grab, Stefan. / Narratives of nineteenth century drought in southern Africa in different historical source types. In: Climatic Change. 2019 ; Vol. 152, No. 3-4. pp. 467-485.
@article{0d06d2050ddf4832a389b490bcbe7cd3,
title = "Narratives of nineteenth century drought in southern Africa in different historical source types",
abstract = "Single- to multiple-year drought episodes posed significant challenges for agrarian communities across southern Africa during the nineteenth century and hence are widely recorded in a variety of historical documents. However, the ways in which droughts are articulated, and the focus of individual accounts, vary considerably between different authors and historical source types. This study draws on a range of documentary source types—specifically newspapers, letters, reports and diaries—to explore the varied narratives associated with three protracted droughts (those of 1861–1863, 1876–1879 and 1895–1897) that affected large areas of the subcontinent. The analysis spans four case study areas—present day KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa), Lesotho, Malawi and the southern Kalahari (Botswana and South Africa)—which were investigated as part of different interdisciplinary projects. We explore issues common to all case study areas, including (i) how specific drought events are framed and (ii) what is and is not reported about individual droughts across different source types. We conclude that different source types in the subcontinent may be more or less appropriate for addressing the specific objectives of historical climatology, particularly in relation to historical drought. Sources such as newspapers and weather diaries are rich in qualitative and quantitative observations suitable for the reconstruction of temporal and spatial patterns of weather and climate, as well as climate-related natural disasters. In contrast, letters, reports and personal journals, especially those written by missionaries, provide additional qualitative narratives through which to investigate the vulnerability of past societies and economies to climate variations, and to explore past discourses and social representations of climate. While studies of this kind have been published for European and American source types, this is the first systematic exploration of documentary sources for the historical climatology of Africa. It should therefore provide a guide for climate history studies elsewhere in the continent, or other regions where written records are absent prior to the arrival of European colonists.",
keywords = "Historical climatology, climate history, drought, documentary evidence, southern Africa",
author = "David Nash and J{\o}rgen Klein and Endfield, {Georgina H.} and Kathleen Pribyl and George Adamson and Stefan Grab",
note = "This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Climatic Change. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2352-6",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-018-2352-6",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "467--485",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
number = "3-4",

}

Narratives of nineteenth century drought in southern Africa in different historical source types. / Nash, David; Klein, Jørgen; Endfield, Georgina H.; Pribyl, Kathleen; Adamson, George; Grab, Stefan.

In: Climatic Change, Vol. 152, No. 3-4, 02.01.2019, p. 467-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narratives of nineteenth century drought in southern Africa in different historical source types

AU - Nash, David

AU - Klein, Jørgen

AU - Endfield, Georgina H.

AU - Pribyl, Kathleen

AU - Adamson, George

AU - Grab, Stefan

N1 - This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Climatic Change. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2352-6

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - Single- to multiple-year drought episodes posed significant challenges for agrarian communities across southern Africa during the nineteenth century and hence are widely recorded in a variety of historical documents. However, the ways in which droughts are articulated, and the focus of individual accounts, vary considerably between different authors and historical source types. This study draws on a range of documentary source types—specifically newspapers, letters, reports and diaries—to explore the varied narratives associated with three protracted droughts (those of 1861–1863, 1876–1879 and 1895–1897) that affected large areas of the subcontinent. The analysis spans four case study areas—present day KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa), Lesotho, Malawi and the southern Kalahari (Botswana and South Africa)—which were investigated as part of different interdisciplinary projects. We explore issues common to all case study areas, including (i) how specific drought events are framed and (ii) what is and is not reported about individual droughts across different source types. We conclude that different source types in the subcontinent may be more or less appropriate for addressing the specific objectives of historical climatology, particularly in relation to historical drought. Sources such as newspapers and weather diaries are rich in qualitative and quantitative observations suitable for the reconstruction of temporal and spatial patterns of weather and climate, as well as climate-related natural disasters. In contrast, letters, reports and personal journals, especially those written by missionaries, provide additional qualitative narratives through which to investigate the vulnerability of past societies and economies to climate variations, and to explore past discourses and social representations of climate. While studies of this kind have been published for European and American source types, this is the first systematic exploration of documentary sources for the historical climatology of Africa. It should therefore provide a guide for climate history studies elsewhere in the continent, or other regions where written records are absent prior to the arrival of European colonists.

AB - Single- to multiple-year drought episodes posed significant challenges for agrarian communities across southern Africa during the nineteenth century and hence are widely recorded in a variety of historical documents. However, the ways in which droughts are articulated, and the focus of individual accounts, vary considerably between different authors and historical source types. This study draws on a range of documentary source types—specifically newspapers, letters, reports and diaries—to explore the varied narratives associated with three protracted droughts (those of 1861–1863, 1876–1879 and 1895–1897) that affected large areas of the subcontinent. The analysis spans four case study areas—present day KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa), Lesotho, Malawi and the southern Kalahari (Botswana and South Africa)—which were investigated as part of different interdisciplinary projects. We explore issues common to all case study areas, including (i) how specific drought events are framed and (ii) what is and is not reported about individual droughts across different source types. We conclude that different source types in the subcontinent may be more or less appropriate for addressing the specific objectives of historical climatology, particularly in relation to historical drought. Sources such as newspapers and weather diaries are rich in qualitative and quantitative observations suitable for the reconstruction of temporal and spatial patterns of weather and climate, as well as climate-related natural disasters. In contrast, letters, reports and personal journals, especially those written by missionaries, provide additional qualitative narratives through which to investigate the vulnerability of past societies and economies to climate variations, and to explore past discourses and social representations of climate. While studies of this kind have been published for European and American source types, this is the first systematic exploration of documentary sources for the historical climatology of Africa. It should therefore provide a guide for climate history studies elsewhere in the continent, or other regions where written records are absent prior to the arrival of European colonists.

KW - Historical climatology

KW - climate history

KW - drought

KW - documentary evidence

KW - southern Africa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059667760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-018-2352-6

DO - 10.1007/s10584-018-2352-6

M3 - Article

VL - 152

SP - 467

EP - 485

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

IS - 3-4

ER -