Modernity, Alienation and the Mirror in the Work of Lacan and Winnicott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Lacan and Winnicott are both profoundly psychosocial thinkers who shared an interest in the modern psyche and the alienation often considered endemic to it. From Freud, Lacan took the theory of narcissism (Borch-Jacobsen, 1991), which he developed into a wide-ranging critique of the psychosocial constitution of the modern subject. Winnicott, on the other hand, trained his eye on the environmental conditions necessary for feeling authentic, or ‘real,’ and the experiences that might produce alienation from this ‘true’ self, and encourage the formation of a narcissistic ‘false’ self (Donald W. Winnicott, 1990). In this context, Lacan and Winnicott’s shared interest in the metaphor and function of the mirror, which has long provided an entry point for clinical and academic comparisons of their work, is a key point of orientation. This article seeks to explore and unpack the relationship between Lacan and Winnicott’s interest in narcissism, alienation and the mirror, locating their thinking in relation to dominant philosophical conceptions of subjectivity and sociological understandings of modernity, dating from the seventeenth to the late nineteenth century. Situating Lacan and Winnicott on this terrain throws their theories of the mirror into relief in important ways. Not only is the ‘modern’ character of psychoanalysis foregrounded, the contribution it can make to social transformation is also affirmed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-38
Number of pages24
JournalAmerican Imago
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Alienation
Modernity
Winnicott
Narcissism
Thinkers
Social Transformation
Psyche
Subjectivity
Sigmund Freud
Constitution
Conception
Relief
Psychoanalysis

Bibliographical note

Published by JHUP. Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Keywords

  • Lacan
  • Winnicott
  • alienation
  • mirror
  • modernity

Cite this

@article{beb79c714979458b905a2960efae7d35,
title = "Modernity, Alienation and the Mirror in the Work of Lacan and Winnicott",
abstract = "Lacan and Winnicott are both profoundly psychosocial thinkers who shared an interest in the modern psyche and the alienation often considered endemic to it. From Freud, Lacan took the theory of narcissism (Borch-Jacobsen, 1991), which he developed into a wide-ranging critique of the psychosocial constitution of the modern subject. Winnicott, on the other hand, trained his eye on the environmental conditions necessary for feeling authentic, or ‘real,’ and the experiences that might produce alienation from this ‘true’ self, and encourage the formation of a narcissistic ‘false’ self (Donald W. Winnicott, 1990). In this context, Lacan and Winnicott’s shared interest in the metaphor and function of the mirror, which has long provided an entry point for clinical and academic comparisons of their work, is a key point of orientation. This article seeks to explore and unpack the relationship between Lacan and Winnicott’s interest in narcissism, alienation and the mirror, locating their thinking in relation to dominant philosophical conceptions of subjectivity and sociological understandings of modernity, dating from the seventeenth to the late nineteenth century. Situating Lacan and Winnicott on this terrain throws their theories of the mirror into relief in important ways. Not only is the ‘modern’ character of psychoanalysis foregrounded, the contribution it can make to social transformation is also affirmed.",
keywords = "Lacan, Winnicott, alienation, mirror, modernity",
author = "Joanna Kellond",
note = "Published by JHUP. Copyright {\circledC} The Johns Hopkins University Press.",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/aim.2019.0001",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "15--38",
journal = "American Imago",
issn = "1085-7931",
number = "1",

}

Modernity, Alienation and the Mirror in the Work of Lacan and Winnicott. / Kellond, Joanna.

In: American Imago, Vol. 76, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 15-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modernity, Alienation and the Mirror in the Work of Lacan and Winnicott

AU - Kellond, Joanna

N1 - Published by JHUP. Copyright © The Johns Hopkins University Press.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Lacan and Winnicott are both profoundly psychosocial thinkers who shared an interest in the modern psyche and the alienation often considered endemic to it. From Freud, Lacan took the theory of narcissism (Borch-Jacobsen, 1991), which he developed into a wide-ranging critique of the psychosocial constitution of the modern subject. Winnicott, on the other hand, trained his eye on the environmental conditions necessary for feeling authentic, or ‘real,’ and the experiences that might produce alienation from this ‘true’ self, and encourage the formation of a narcissistic ‘false’ self (Donald W. Winnicott, 1990). In this context, Lacan and Winnicott’s shared interest in the metaphor and function of the mirror, which has long provided an entry point for clinical and academic comparisons of their work, is a key point of orientation. This article seeks to explore and unpack the relationship between Lacan and Winnicott’s interest in narcissism, alienation and the mirror, locating their thinking in relation to dominant philosophical conceptions of subjectivity and sociological understandings of modernity, dating from the seventeenth to the late nineteenth century. Situating Lacan and Winnicott on this terrain throws their theories of the mirror into relief in important ways. Not only is the ‘modern’ character of psychoanalysis foregrounded, the contribution it can make to social transformation is also affirmed.

AB - Lacan and Winnicott are both profoundly psychosocial thinkers who shared an interest in the modern psyche and the alienation often considered endemic to it. From Freud, Lacan took the theory of narcissism (Borch-Jacobsen, 1991), which he developed into a wide-ranging critique of the psychosocial constitution of the modern subject. Winnicott, on the other hand, trained his eye on the environmental conditions necessary for feeling authentic, or ‘real,’ and the experiences that might produce alienation from this ‘true’ self, and encourage the formation of a narcissistic ‘false’ self (Donald W. Winnicott, 1990). In this context, Lacan and Winnicott’s shared interest in the metaphor and function of the mirror, which has long provided an entry point for clinical and academic comparisons of their work, is a key point of orientation. This article seeks to explore and unpack the relationship between Lacan and Winnicott’s interest in narcissism, alienation and the mirror, locating their thinking in relation to dominant philosophical conceptions of subjectivity and sociological understandings of modernity, dating from the seventeenth to the late nineteenth century. Situating Lacan and Winnicott on this terrain throws their theories of the mirror into relief in important ways. Not only is the ‘modern’ character of psychoanalysis foregrounded, the contribution it can make to social transformation is also affirmed.

KW - Lacan

KW - Winnicott

KW - alienation

KW - mirror

KW - modernity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065916529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/aim.2019.0001

DO - 10.1353/aim.2019.0001

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 15

EP - 38

JO - American Imago

JF - American Imago

SN - 1085-7931

IS - 1

ER -