Methodological needs in the quality and safety characterisation of nanotechnology-based health products: Priorities for method development and standardisation

Blanka Halamoda-Kenzaoui, Rob Vandebriel, A Howarth, Marco Siccardi, C.A.W. David, John Liptrott, Matteo Santin, Sven Borgos, Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann, Fanny Caputo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Nanotechnology-based health products are providing innovative solutions in health technologies and the pharmaceutical field, responding to unmet clinical needs. However, suitable standardised methods need to be available for quality and safety assessments of these innovative products prior to their translation into the clinic and for monitoring their performance when manufacturing processes are changed. The question arises which technological solutions are currently available within the scientific community to support the requested characterisation of nanotechnology-based products, and which methodological developments should be prioritized to support product developers in their regulatory assessment. To this end, the work presented here explored the state-of-the-art methods to identify methodological gaps associated with the preclinical characterisation of nanotechnology-based medicinal products and medical devices. The regulatory information needs, as expressed by regulatory authorities, were extracted from the guidance documents released so far for nanotechnology-based health products and mapped against available methods, thus allowing an analysis of methodological gaps and needs. In the first step, only standardised methods were considered, leading to the identification of methodological needs in five areas of characterisation, including: (i) surface properties, (ii) drug loading and release, (iii) kinetic properties in complex biological media, (iv) ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) parameters and (v) interaction with blood and the immune system. In the second step, a detailed gap analysis included analytical approaches in earlier stages of development, and standardised test methods from outside of the nanotechnology field that could address the identified areas of gaps. Based on this analysis, three categories of methodological needs were identified, including (i) method optimisation/adaptation to nanotechnological platforms, (ii) method validation/standardisation and (iii) method development for those areas where no technological solutions currently exist. The results of the analysis presented in this work should raise awareness within the scientific community on existing and emerging methodological needs, setting priorities for the development and standardisation of relevant analytical and toxicological methods allowing the development of a robust testing strategy for nanotechnology-based health products.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)192-206
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Controlled Release
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( Funding Information: The authors would like to thank Dr. Andrea Valsesia for the helpful comments of the part related to hydrophobicity measurement. The present work has been developed within the REFINE project : Regulatory Science Framework for Nano(bio)material-based Medical Products and Devices, funded by European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement no 761104 .


  • nanobiomaterials
  • nanomedicine
  • tests
  • methodology
  • gap analysis
  • Nanotechnology-based products
  • Methodological gaps
  • Physicochemical characterisation
  • Regulatory needs
  • Immunotoxicity assessment
  • Method development
  • Method standardisation
  • Nanomedicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological needs in the quality and safety characterisation of nanotechnology-based health products: Priorities for method development and standardisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this