TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete
T2 - a RILEM 304-ADC interlaboratory study – compressive strength and modulus of elasticity
AU - Mechtcherine, Viktor
AU - Muthukrishnan, Shravan
AU - Robens-Radermacher, Annika
AU - Wolfs, Rob
AU - Versteege, Jelle
AU - Menna, Costantino
AU - Ozturk, Onur
AU - Zihnioglu, Nilufer Ozyurt
AU - Roupec, Josef
AU - Richter, Christiane
AU - Jungwirth, Jörg
AU - Miranda, Luiza
AU - Ammann, Rebecca
AU - caron, jean-francois
AU - Bono, Victor De
AU - Monte, Renata
AU - Navarrete, Ivan
AU - Soto, Claudia Eugenin
AU - LOMBOIS-BURGER, HELENE
AU - BAZ, Bilal
AU - Sinka, Maris
AU - Sapata, Alise
AU - Harbouz, Ilhame
AU - Zhang, Yamei
AU - Jia, Zijian
AU - Kruger, Jacques
AU - Mostert, Jean-Pierre
AU - Štefančič, Mateja
AU - Hanžič, Lucija
AU - KACI, Abdelhak
AU - Rahal, Said
AU - Santhanam, Manu
AU - Bhattacherjee, Shantanu
AU - Snguanyat, chalermwut
AU - Arunothayan, Arun
AU - ZHAO, Zengfeng
AU - Mai, Inka
AU - Rasehorn, Inken Jette
AU - Böhler, David
AU - Freund, Niklas
AU - Lowke, Dirk
AU - Neef, Tobias
AU - Taubert, Markus
AU - Auer, Daniel
AU - Hechtl, Christian Maximilian
AU - Dahlenburg, Maximilian
AU - Esposito, Laura
AU - Buswell, Richard
AU - Kolawole, John Temitope
AU - ISA, MUHAMMAD NURA
AU - Liu, Xingzi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/6/24
Y1 - 2025/6/24
N2 - Traditional construction techniques, such as in-situ casting and pre-cast concrete methods, have well-established testing protocols for assessing compressive strength and modulus of elasticity, including specific procedures for sample preparation and curing. In contrast, 3D concrete printing currently lacks standardized testing protocols, potentially contributing to the inconsistent results reported in previous studies. To address this issue, RILEM TC 304-ADC initiated a comprehensive interlaboratory study on the mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete. This study involves 30 laboratories worldwide, contributing 34 sets of data, with some laboratories testing more than one mix design. The compressive strength and modulus of elasticity were determined under three distinct conditions: Default, where each laboratory printed according to their standard procedure followed by water bath curing; Deviation 1, which involved creating a cold joint by increasing the time interval between printing layers; and Deviation 2, where the standard printing process was used, but the specimens were cured under conditions different from water bath. Some tests were conducted at two different scales based on specimen size—“mortar-scale” and “concrete-scale”—to investigate the size effect on compressive strength. Since the mix design remained identical for both scales, the only variable was the specimen size. This paper reports on the findings from the interlaboratory study, followed by a detailed investigation into the influencing parameters such as extraction location, cold joints, number of interlayers, and curing conditions on the mechanical properties of the printed concrete. As this study includes results from laboratories worldwide, its contribution to the development of relevant standardized testing protocols is critical.
AB - Traditional construction techniques, such as in-situ casting and pre-cast concrete methods, have well-established testing protocols for assessing compressive strength and modulus of elasticity, including specific procedures for sample preparation and curing. In contrast, 3D concrete printing currently lacks standardized testing protocols, potentially contributing to the inconsistent results reported in previous studies. To address this issue, RILEM TC 304-ADC initiated a comprehensive interlaboratory study on the mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete. This study involves 30 laboratories worldwide, contributing 34 sets of data, with some laboratories testing more than one mix design. The compressive strength and modulus of elasticity were determined under three distinct conditions: Default, where each laboratory printed according to their standard procedure followed by water bath curing; Deviation 1, which involved creating a cold joint by increasing the time interval between printing layers; and Deviation 2, where the standard printing process was used, but the specimens were cured under conditions different from water bath. Some tests were conducted at two different scales based on specimen size—“mortar-scale” and “concrete-scale”—to investigate the size effect on compressive strength. Since the mix design remained identical for both scales, the only variable was the specimen size. This paper reports on the findings from the interlaboratory study, followed by a detailed investigation into the influencing parameters such as extraction location, cold joints, number of interlayers, and curing conditions on the mechanical properties of the printed concrete. As this study includes results from laboratories worldwide, its contribution to the development of relevant standardized testing protocols is critical.
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Digital fabrication
KW - Hardened concrete
KW - Compressive strength
KW - Young’s modulus
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009270658
U2 - 10.1617/s11527-025-02688-9
DO - 10.1617/s11527-025-02688-9
M3 - Article
SN - 1359-5997
VL - 58
JO - Materials and Structures
JF - Materials and Structures
IS - 5
M1 - 181
ER -