Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
The University of Brighton Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
Equipment
Projects
Research output
Activities
Student theses
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
London 2012: how was it for us?
Mark Perryman
(Editor)
University of Brighton
Research output
:
Book/Report
›
Book - edited
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'London 2012: how was it for us?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
London 2012
100%
Olympics
66%
Politics
33%
Sport Policy
33%
Cultural Critics
33%
Economic Regeneration
33%
Ceremony
33%
Journalists
33%
Bell
33%
Gilbert
33%
KatE
33%
Sporting Events
33%
Olympism
33%
Paralympics
33%
Good for
33%
London 2012 Olympics
33%
Barbara
33%
Campaigners
33%
GLA-SE
33%
Game Impact
33%
Yasmin
33%
Society Value
33%
Social Critics
33%
Bragg
33%
Medicine and Dentistry
Lifespan
100%
Ceremony
100%
Drospirenone Plus Ethinylestradiol
100%
Regeneration
100%
Social Sciences
London
100%
UK
25%
Sport Policy
25%
Journalist
25%
Authors
25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Sport Policy
100%