Life from the fragments: Ambivalence, critique, and minoritarian affect

Eleanor Wilkinson, Jason Lim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this commentary, we respond to Ruez and Cockayne’s ‘Feeling Otherwise’ and consider what is at stake in debates concerning the moods and modes of critique. There is a tendency in geographical work on affect to privilege affirmation, yet a key question remains as to who benefits from such moods of critique and the kinds of analysis that they afford. We argue that dominant theorisations of affirmation and negativity often elide uncomfortable discussions of power, domination, and violence. We offer a reading of the relations between affirmation and negativity through ‘minoritarian affects’ – a reading that arises in the midst of living through racial capitalism, coloniality, patriarchy, and heteronormativity and which builds an indeterminate future from the fragments of our lives and bodies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-116
Number of pages5
JournalDialogues in Human Geography
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • affect theory
  • affirmation
  • ambivalence
  • critique
  • queer affect

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Life from the fragments: Ambivalence, critique, and minoritarian affect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this