Learning to Deliver a Mega-project: The Case of Heathrow Terminal 5

Tim Brady, Andrew Davies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapter

Abstract

Most ‘mega’ projects are overdue, over budget and fail to meet the client’s original specifications (Flyvbjerg et al, 2003). Cost overruns of 50% are typical and overruns of 100% not unusual. The reconstruction of Wembley Stadium, for example, ended up 80% over budget and four years later than originally planned. For a long time, Heathrow’s Terminal 5 appeared to be bucking the trend, it was on schedule and to budget, only for defeat seeming to be clutched from the jaws of victory at its official opening on March 27th 2008 when “what should have been an occasion of national pride was in fact an occasion of national embarrassment.” (HC 543, 2008). Multiple problems arose with the baggage handling system, issues with staff car parking, and security procedures for staff needing to move airside. The newspaper headlines that week were damning. That the building had been delivered on time and to budget was forgotten in the wave of bad publicity which left a general perception that T5 was another failure when in fact it had much to celebrate.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProcuring Complex Performance: Studies of Innovation in Product-Service Management
EditorsNigel Caldwell, Mickey Howard
Place of PublicationNew York, USA
PublisherRoutledge
Pages174-198
Number of pages25
ISBN (Print)9780415800051
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

budget
learning
staff
national consciousness
publicity
newspaper
reconstruction
trend
costs
time

Keywords

  • Mega project
  • Project performance
  • Innovative approach
  • Learning from projects
  • Project capabilities
  • Heathrow
  • Innovation
  • CENTRIM

Cite this

Brady, T., & Davies, A. (2010). Learning to Deliver a Mega-project: The Case of Heathrow Terminal 5. In N. Caldwell, & M. Howard (Eds.), Procuring Complex Performance: Studies of Innovation in Product-Service Management (pp. 174-198). New York, USA: Routledge.
Brady, Tim ; Davies, Andrew. / Learning to Deliver a Mega-project: The Case of Heathrow Terminal 5. Procuring Complex Performance: Studies of Innovation in Product-Service Management. editor / Nigel Caldwell ; Mickey Howard. New York, USA : Routledge, 2010. pp. 174-198
@inbook{3e3ef30e17d448c593bfa49c5f5b136b,
title = "Learning to Deliver a Mega-project: The Case of Heathrow Terminal 5",
abstract = "Most ‘mega’ projects are overdue, over budget and fail to meet the client’s original specifications (Flyvbjerg et al, 2003). Cost overruns of 50{\%} are typical and overruns of 100{\%} not unusual. The reconstruction of Wembley Stadium, for example, ended up 80{\%} over budget and four years later than originally planned. For a long time, Heathrow’s Terminal 5 appeared to be bucking the trend, it was on schedule and to budget, only for defeat seeming to be clutched from the jaws of victory at its official opening on March 27th 2008 when “what should have been an occasion of national pride was in fact an occasion of national embarrassment.” (HC 543, 2008). Multiple problems arose with the baggage handling system, issues with staff car parking, and security procedures for staff needing to move airside. The newspaper headlines that week were damning. That the building had been delivered on time and to budget was forgotten in the wave of bad publicity which left a general perception that T5 was another failure when in fact it had much to celebrate.",
keywords = "Mega project, Project performance, Innovative approach, Learning from projects, Project capabilities, Heathrow, Innovation, CENTRIM",
author = "Tim Brady and Andrew Davies",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415800051",
pages = "174--198",
editor = "Nigel Caldwell and Mickey Howard",
booktitle = "Procuring Complex Performance: Studies of Innovation in Product-Service Management",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Brady, T & Davies, A 2010, Learning to Deliver a Mega-project: The Case of Heathrow Terminal 5. in N Caldwell & M Howard (eds), Procuring Complex Performance: Studies of Innovation in Product-Service Management. Routledge, New York, USA, pp. 174-198.

Learning to Deliver a Mega-project: The Case of Heathrow Terminal 5. / Brady, Tim; Davies, Andrew.

Procuring Complex Performance: Studies of Innovation in Product-Service Management. ed. / Nigel Caldwell; Mickey Howard. New York, USA : Routledge, 2010. p. 174-198.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Learning to Deliver a Mega-project: The Case of Heathrow Terminal 5

AU - Brady, Tim

AU - Davies, Andrew

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Most ‘mega’ projects are overdue, over budget and fail to meet the client’s original specifications (Flyvbjerg et al, 2003). Cost overruns of 50% are typical and overruns of 100% not unusual. The reconstruction of Wembley Stadium, for example, ended up 80% over budget and four years later than originally planned. For a long time, Heathrow’s Terminal 5 appeared to be bucking the trend, it was on schedule and to budget, only for defeat seeming to be clutched from the jaws of victory at its official opening on March 27th 2008 when “what should have been an occasion of national pride was in fact an occasion of national embarrassment.” (HC 543, 2008). Multiple problems arose with the baggage handling system, issues with staff car parking, and security procedures for staff needing to move airside. The newspaper headlines that week were damning. That the building had been delivered on time and to budget was forgotten in the wave of bad publicity which left a general perception that T5 was another failure when in fact it had much to celebrate.

AB - Most ‘mega’ projects are overdue, over budget and fail to meet the client’s original specifications (Flyvbjerg et al, 2003). Cost overruns of 50% are typical and overruns of 100% not unusual. The reconstruction of Wembley Stadium, for example, ended up 80% over budget and four years later than originally planned. For a long time, Heathrow’s Terminal 5 appeared to be bucking the trend, it was on schedule and to budget, only for defeat seeming to be clutched from the jaws of victory at its official opening on March 27th 2008 when “what should have been an occasion of national pride was in fact an occasion of national embarrassment.” (HC 543, 2008). Multiple problems arose with the baggage handling system, issues with staff car parking, and security procedures for staff needing to move airside. The newspaper headlines that week were damning. That the building had been delivered on time and to budget was forgotten in the wave of bad publicity which left a general perception that T5 was another failure when in fact it had much to celebrate.

KW - Mega project

KW - Project performance

KW - Innovative approach

KW - Learning from projects

KW - Project capabilities

KW - Heathrow

KW - Innovation

KW - CENTRIM

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780415800051

SP - 174

EP - 198

BT - Procuring Complex Performance: Studies of Innovation in Product-Service Management

A2 - Caldwell, Nigel

A2 - Howard, Mickey

PB - Routledge

CY - New York, USA

ER -

Brady T, Davies A. Learning to Deliver a Mega-project: The Case of Heathrow Terminal 5. In Caldwell N, Howard M, editors, Procuring Complex Performance: Studies of Innovation in Product-Service Management. New York, USA: Routledge. 2010. p. 174-198