Leading changes: Why transformation explanations fail

Mark Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Professor John Kotter (1995) claimed in Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail to have identified eight leadership errors which resulted in transformation failures. He followed this up in 1996 with his best-selling book Leading Change, prescribing an eight-step model for leading trans- formations encouraging change leaders to create a sense of urgency, build powerful guiding coalitions and develop visions. Kotter openly acknowledged that he neither drew examples nor major ideas from any published source, except his own writing. In the 2012 edition of his book, which included a new preface, Kotter claimed that his book was now more relevant than when it was first published. As leaders knowingly or unknowingly still use Kotter’s steps and academics still cite this book, this paper critically assesses Kotter’s claim about the relevance of Leading Change. Three conclusions are drawn; Leading Change remains an enduring landmark leadership study, but Leading Change is stuck in the past and paradoxically today discourages change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-469
Number of pages21
JournalLeadership
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Prescribing

Keywords

  • John Kotter
  • leading change
  • transformation
  • organizational change

Cite this

Hughes, Mark. / Leading changes: Why transformation explanations fail. In: Leadership. 2016 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 449-469.
@article{8422c2facbbe40dbb95e0f6a58f1de9a,
title = "Leading changes: Why transformation explanations fail",
abstract = "Professor John Kotter (1995) claimed in Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail to have identified eight leadership errors which resulted in transformation failures. He followed this up in 1996 with his best-selling book Leading Change, prescribing an eight-step model for leading trans- formations encouraging change leaders to create a sense of urgency, build powerful guiding coalitions and develop visions. Kotter openly acknowledged that he neither drew examples nor major ideas from any published source, except his own writing. In the 2012 edition of his book, which included a new preface, Kotter claimed that his book was now more relevant than when it was first published. As leaders knowingly or unknowingly still use Kotter’s steps and academics still cite this book, this paper critically assesses Kotter’s claim about the relevance of Leading Change. Three conclusions are drawn; Leading Change remains an enduring landmark leadership study, but Leading Change is stuck in the past and paradoxically today discourages change.",
keywords = "John Kotter, leading change, transformation, organizational change",
author = "Mark Hughes",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1742715015571393",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "449--469",
journal = "Leadership",
issn = "1742-7150",
number = "4",

}

Leading changes: Why transformation explanations fail. / Hughes, Mark.

In: Leadership, Vol. 12, No. 4, 01.09.2016, p. 449-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leading changes: Why transformation explanations fail

AU - Hughes, Mark

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Professor John Kotter (1995) claimed in Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail to have identified eight leadership errors which resulted in transformation failures. He followed this up in 1996 with his best-selling book Leading Change, prescribing an eight-step model for leading trans- formations encouraging change leaders to create a sense of urgency, build powerful guiding coalitions and develop visions. Kotter openly acknowledged that he neither drew examples nor major ideas from any published source, except his own writing. In the 2012 edition of his book, which included a new preface, Kotter claimed that his book was now more relevant than when it was first published. As leaders knowingly or unknowingly still use Kotter’s steps and academics still cite this book, this paper critically assesses Kotter’s claim about the relevance of Leading Change. Three conclusions are drawn; Leading Change remains an enduring landmark leadership study, but Leading Change is stuck in the past and paradoxically today discourages change.

AB - Professor John Kotter (1995) claimed in Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail to have identified eight leadership errors which resulted in transformation failures. He followed this up in 1996 with his best-selling book Leading Change, prescribing an eight-step model for leading trans- formations encouraging change leaders to create a sense of urgency, build powerful guiding coalitions and develop visions. Kotter openly acknowledged that he neither drew examples nor major ideas from any published source, except his own writing. In the 2012 edition of his book, which included a new preface, Kotter claimed that his book was now more relevant than when it was first published. As leaders knowingly or unknowingly still use Kotter’s steps and academics still cite this book, this paper critically assesses Kotter’s claim about the relevance of Leading Change. Three conclusions are drawn; Leading Change remains an enduring landmark leadership study, but Leading Change is stuck in the past and paradoxically today discourages change.

KW - John Kotter

KW - leading change

KW - transformation

KW - organizational change

U2 - 10.1177/1742715015571393

DO - 10.1177/1742715015571393

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 449

EP - 469

JO - Leadership

JF - Leadership

SN - 1742-7150

IS - 4

ER -