Judgemental and developmental mentoring in Further Education Initial Teacher Education in England: Mentor and mentee perspectives

Catherine Manning, Andrew Hobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article presents findings from a study which sought to identify the extent to which trainee teachers and their mentors considered their mentoring experiences and approaches to be judgemental or developmental. The article draws on a case study of trainee teachers and mentors on an Initial Teacher Education programme at a Further Education college on the south coast of England. Data were generated from an initial survey of 22 teachers, from which seven pairs of teachers and mentors also participated in part-structured individual interviews and direct observation of one of their mentoring meetings. In addition, 8 of the interviewees also participated in a follow up email survey. The findings highlight significant variation in mentoring practices, with both judgemental and developmental mentoring approaches in use. A distinct discrepancy is also identified between the perceptions of mentors and mentees regarding the nature of the mentoring experience, with most mentors describing their approaches as developmental and most mentees describing these as judgemental. In addition, mentor education was found to enhance mentors’ enactment of developmental as opposed to judgemental mentoring. A number of possible implications for policy, practice and further research are discussed
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-595
Number of pages22
JournalResearch in Post-Compulsory Education
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

further education
mentoring
teacher
education
trainee
experience
interview

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 13/12/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13596748.2017.1381377

Keywords

  • further education
  • initial teacher education
  • judgementoring
  • developmental mentoring
  • mentor education

Cite this

@article{f05c98566d2c4716a16b1bb89d473cf9,
title = "Judgemental and developmental mentoring in Further Education Initial Teacher Education in England: Mentor and mentee perspectives",
abstract = "This article presents findings from a study which sought to identify the extent to which trainee teachers and their mentors considered their mentoring experiences and approaches to be judgemental or developmental. The article draws on a case study of trainee teachers and mentors on an Initial Teacher Education programme at a Further Education college on the south coast of England. Data were generated from an initial survey of 22 teachers, from which seven pairs of teachers and mentors also participated in part-structured individual interviews and direct observation of one of their mentoring meetings. In addition, 8 of the interviewees also participated in a follow up email survey. The findings highlight significant variation in mentoring practices, with both judgemental and developmental mentoring approaches in use. A distinct discrepancy is also identified between the perceptions of mentors and mentees regarding the nature of the mentoring experience, with most mentors describing their approaches as developmental and most mentees describing these as judgemental. In addition, mentor education was found to enhance mentors’ enactment of developmental as opposed to judgemental mentoring. A number of possible implications for policy, practice and further research are discussed",
keywords = "further education, initial teacher education, judgementoring, developmental mentoring, mentor education",
author = "Catherine Manning and Andrew Hobson",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 13/12/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13596748.2017.1381377",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1080/13596748.2017.1381377",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "574--595",
journal = "Research in Post-Compulsory Education",
issn = "1359-6748",
number = "4",

}

Judgemental and developmental mentoring in Further Education Initial Teacher Education in England: Mentor and mentee perspectives. / Manning, Catherine; Hobson, Andrew.

In: Research in Post-Compulsory Education, Vol. 22, No. 4, 13.12.2017, p. 574-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judgemental and developmental mentoring in Further Education Initial Teacher Education in England: Mentor and mentee perspectives

AU - Manning, Catherine

AU - Hobson, Andrew

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 13/12/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13596748.2017.1381377

PY - 2017/12/13

Y1 - 2017/12/13

N2 - This article presents findings from a study which sought to identify the extent to which trainee teachers and their mentors considered their mentoring experiences and approaches to be judgemental or developmental. The article draws on a case study of trainee teachers and mentors on an Initial Teacher Education programme at a Further Education college on the south coast of England. Data were generated from an initial survey of 22 teachers, from which seven pairs of teachers and mentors also participated in part-structured individual interviews and direct observation of one of their mentoring meetings. In addition, 8 of the interviewees also participated in a follow up email survey. The findings highlight significant variation in mentoring practices, with both judgemental and developmental mentoring approaches in use. A distinct discrepancy is also identified between the perceptions of mentors and mentees regarding the nature of the mentoring experience, with most mentors describing their approaches as developmental and most mentees describing these as judgemental. In addition, mentor education was found to enhance mentors’ enactment of developmental as opposed to judgemental mentoring. A number of possible implications for policy, practice and further research are discussed

AB - This article presents findings from a study which sought to identify the extent to which trainee teachers and their mentors considered their mentoring experiences and approaches to be judgemental or developmental. The article draws on a case study of trainee teachers and mentors on an Initial Teacher Education programme at a Further Education college on the south coast of England. Data were generated from an initial survey of 22 teachers, from which seven pairs of teachers and mentors also participated in part-structured individual interviews and direct observation of one of their mentoring meetings. In addition, 8 of the interviewees also participated in a follow up email survey. The findings highlight significant variation in mentoring practices, with both judgemental and developmental mentoring approaches in use. A distinct discrepancy is also identified between the perceptions of mentors and mentees regarding the nature of the mentoring experience, with most mentors describing their approaches as developmental and most mentees describing these as judgemental. In addition, mentor education was found to enhance mentors’ enactment of developmental as opposed to judgemental mentoring. A number of possible implications for policy, practice and further research are discussed

KW - further education

KW - initial teacher education

KW - judgementoring

KW - developmental mentoring

KW - mentor education

U2 - 10.1080/13596748.2017.1381377

DO - 10.1080/13596748.2017.1381377

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 574

EP - 595

JO - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

T2 - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

JF - Research in Post-Compulsory Education

SN - 1359-6748

IS - 4

ER -