Isothermic and fixed intensity heat acclimation methods induce similar heat adaptation following short and long-term timescales

Oliver Gibson, Jessica Mee, J.A. Tuttle, Lee Taylor, Peter Watt, Neil Maxwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Heat acclimation requires the interaction between hot environments and exercise to elicit thermoregulatory adaptations. Optimal synergism between these parameters is unknown. Common practise involves utilising a fixed workload model where exercise prescription is controlled and core temperature is uncontrolled, or an isothermic model where core temperature is controlled and work rate is manipulated to control core temperature. Following a baseline heat stress test; 24 males performed a between groups experimental design performing short term heat acclimation (STHA; five 90min sessions) and long term heat acclimation (LTHA; STHA plus further five 90min sessions) utilising either fixed intensity (50%), continuous isothermic (target rectal temperature 38.5°C for STHA and LTHA), or progressive isothermic heat acclimation (target rectal temperature 38.5°C for STHA, and 39.0°C for LTHA). Identical heat stress tests followed STHA and LTHA to determine the magnitude of adaptation. All methods induced equal adaptation from baseline however isothermic methods induced adaptation and reduced exercise durations (STHA=−66% and LTHA=−72%) and mean session intensity (STHA=−13%and LTHA=−9%) in comparison to fixed (p<0.05). STHA decreased exercising heart rate (−10bmin−1), core (−0.2°C) and skin temperature (−0.51°C), with sweat losses increasing (+0.36Lh−1) (p<0.05). No difference between heat acclimation methods, and no further benefit of LTHA was observed (p>0.05). Only thermal sensation improved from baseline to STHA (−0.2), and then between STHA and LTHA (−0.5) (p<0.05). Both the continuous and progressive isothermic methods elicited exercise duration, mean session intensity, and meanTrecanalogous to more efficient administration for maximising adaptation. Short term isothermic methods are therefore optimal for individuals aiming to achieve heat adaptation most economically, i.e. when integrating heat acclimation into a pre-competition taper. Fixed methods may be optimal for military and occupational applications due to lower exercise intensity and simplified administration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-65
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Thermal Biology
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2015

Bibliographical note

© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


  • Heat illness
  • Heat stress
  • Hyperthermia
  • Taper
  • Temperature
  • Thermoregulation


Dive into the research topics of 'Isothermic and fixed intensity heat acclimation methods induce similar heat adaptation following short and long-term timescales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this