Investigating the benefits of Swiss lightweight organic meadow roofs in the green retrofit construction sector

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNConference contribution with ISSN or ISBN

Abstract

Premise: Are Swiss lightweight meadow roofs ready for the UK retrofit market? Basel City Council and others in Switzerland some years ago made it compulsory for all new buildings, and temporary buildings with an 18-month or longer lifetime, to include organic green roofs. The primary drivers were to reduce the impact of seasonal storms: green roofs are able to provide excellent water attenuation, and to promote biodiversity (urban areas are heavily developed in Switzerland because the mountainous terrain outside cities prevents sprawl). ZHAW (Zurich School of Applied Science) green roof research department has been given input into the design of green roofs even on commercial projects as stakeholders in the planning and Building Control process, and this has enabled them to undertake multiple experiments on public and commercial buildings into the viability of different lightweight build-ups, primarily in respect of the impact on vegetation. One in particular, which utilises locally available agricultural waste (china reed) to replace much of the heavy growing medium, has proven particularly successful. This approach currently has been replicated on many roofs including Basel central tram depot over the ensuing fifteen years. The University of Brighton’s Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) programme supported an emerging company ‘Organic Roofs Ltd’ to undertake research that built upon ZHAW plant monitoring, looking further into the potential benefits of these lightweight meadow green roof systems to be used on existing buildings: to satisfy the requirements of designers, contractors and occupants requiring a climate resilient refurbished building stock. The KTP team, including Baker-Brown and Evans, considered how the Swiss-inspired ‘haybase’ roofs compared with other and popular systems currently available in the UK (mainly Sedum roofs). They considered: * Water attenuation ability * The weight of roof systems when saturated * Levels of biodiversity & plant succession * The Longevity of vegetation * Evaluation of how the performance of roof systems varies over time, and its characteristics when stable * Levels of Carbon sequestration (from the straw itself and the atmosphere) * Material provenance and sustainable supply chain * Requirements for maintenance Research Approach The KTP team were assembled for a year with the objective of testing the ‘haybase’ lightweight meadow roof system as a viable commercial option to popular green roof systems. It comprised Evans who is an expert green roof contractor, Knights a full-time research fellow, plus Baker-Brown an architect and academic, and finally Dr. Anja Rott an academic botanist (both employed by the University of Brighton). The following research methods were employed: * The KTP team have been in regular communication with the research team at ZHAW whose research was focused on issues of the biodiversity of meadow roofs in urban environments * The KTP team met with ZHAW research team in Switzerland and visited numerous new and established green roof sites including the famous ‘chicken shed meadow roof’. * The research fellow and Evans constructed nine purpose-built ‘test rigs’ comparing nine different green roof systems i.e. substrate/ no substrate, drainage/ no drainage, pre-grown planting/ seeded etc. including an empty flat roof control rig. An additional rig was set up to enable visual monitoring of the process of organic material breakdown. * The test rigs were monitored for cumulative rainfall over the duration of the KTP. * A further dynamic loading test saw the development of new saturation methodology which provided real-time evaluation of loadings of HayBase and alternative build-ups during 6 hour 1/100 year rainfall event. The novel contribution is itself the subject of a paper by Evans, Knights and a member of the Institute of Materials, Mr C Fentiman. * At the start and completion of the year-long research project key stakeholders and professionals were contacted and asked to take part in an on-line survey considering the benefits and challenges associated with green roofs. * Samples of substrate were sent to a Newcastle University research team working on ‘carbon capture gardens’ to test permanent carbonation by the ingredients of the commercial substrate of the CO2 in the straw and hay. * Samples of ‘haybase’ roofs at ages 0, 1, 1.5 and 3 years were dried and incinerated under lab conditions to test organic content (which relates to existing UK ordinances regarding fire safety of green roofing materials). Research Outputs The research has produced data from the two online surveys as well as findings from monitoring the nine test rigs and four commercial green roof installations that were between twelve months and four years established. This will be presented within our paper. The References and Sources ZHAW: Asphof, Rothenfluh (Canton Basel-Land) Brenneisen, S: New lightweight solutions for green roofs, paper to 10th Cities Alive Green Roof and Wall Congress, October 2012 Getter, Rowe, Roberston & Andresen - Carbon Sequestration potential of Extensive Green Roofs, Env Science Technology 2009, 43, 7564-7570 Washbourne, Lopez-Capal, Renforth, Ascough, Manning - Rapid Removal of Atmospheric CO2 by Urban Soils, Env Science Technology, 2015, 49, 5434-5440 GLA - London Sustainable Drainage Action Plan, Draft for Public Consultation, October 2015 GRO Code of practice for green roofs, 2014 version, www.greenroofcode.co.uk Gedge, Grant, Kardas, Dinham: Creating Green Roofs for Invertebrates: A Best Practice Guide,https://www.buglife.org.uk/sites/default/files/Creating%20Green%20Roofs%20for%20Invertebrates_Best%20practice%20guidance.pdf
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference
Place of PublicationUniversity of the Creative Arts Farnham Surrey
PublisherThe Centre for Sustainable Design
Pages23-32
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9780954395094
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2016
EventSustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference - University for the Creative Arts Epsom Surrey KT18 5BE UK
Duration: 16 Nov 2016 → …

Conference

ConferenceSustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference
Period16/11/16 → …

Fingerprint

meadow
roof
substrate
biodiversity
drainage
carbon sequestration
straw
stakeholder
monitoring
applied science

Bibliographical note

© The Centre for Sustainable Design

Cite this

Baker-Brown, D., & Evans, L. (2016). Investigating the benefits of Swiss lightweight organic meadow roofs in the green retrofit construction sector. In Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference (pp. 23-32). University of the Creative Arts Farnham Surrey: The Centre for Sustainable Design.
Baker-Brown, Duncan ; Evans, Lee. / Investigating the benefits of Swiss lightweight organic meadow roofs in the green retrofit construction sector. Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference. University of the Creative Arts Farnham Surrey : The Centre for Sustainable Design, 2016. pp. 23-32
@inproceedings{d15195186d814004aadd1b39ed8e40e7,
title = "Investigating the benefits of Swiss lightweight organic meadow roofs in the green retrofit construction sector",
abstract = "Premise: Are Swiss lightweight meadow roofs ready for the UK retrofit market? Basel City Council and others in Switzerland some years ago made it compulsory for all new buildings, and temporary buildings with an 18-month or longer lifetime, to include organic green roofs. The primary drivers were to reduce the impact of seasonal storms: green roofs are able to provide excellent water attenuation, and to promote biodiversity (urban areas are heavily developed in Switzerland because the mountainous terrain outside cities prevents sprawl). ZHAW (Zurich School of Applied Science) green roof research department has been given input into the design of green roofs even on commercial projects as stakeholders in the planning and Building Control process, and this has enabled them to undertake multiple experiments on public and commercial buildings into the viability of different lightweight build-ups, primarily in respect of the impact on vegetation. One in particular, which utilises locally available agricultural waste (china reed) to replace much of the heavy growing medium, has proven particularly successful. This approach currently has been replicated on many roofs including Basel central tram depot over the ensuing fifteen years. The University of Brighton’s Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) programme supported an emerging company ‘Organic Roofs Ltd’ to undertake research that built upon ZHAW plant monitoring, looking further into the potential benefits of these lightweight meadow green roof systems to be used on existing buildings: to satisfy the requirements of designers, contractors and occupants requiring a climate resilient refurbished building stock. The KTP team, including Baker-Brown and Evans, considered how the Swiss-inspired ‘haybase’ roofs compared with other and popular systems currently available in the UK (mainly Sedum roofs). They considered: * Water attenuation ability * The weight of roof systems when saturated * Levels of biodiversity & plant succession * The Longevity of vegetation * Evaluation of how the performance of roof systems varies over time, and its characteristics when stable * Levels of Carbon sequestration (from the straw itself and the atmosphere) * Material provenance and sustainable supply chain * Requirements for maintenance Research Approach The KTP team were assembled for a year with the objective of testing the ‘haybase’ lightweight meadow roof system as a viable commercial option to popular green roof systems. It comprised Evans who is an expert green roof contractor, Knights a full-time research fellow, plus Baker-Brown an architect and academic, and finally Dr. Anja Rott an academic botanist (both employed by the University of Brighton). The following research methods were employed: * The KTP team have been in regular communication with the research team at ZHAW whose research was focused on issues of the biodiversity of meadow roofs in urban environments * The KTP team met with ZHAW research team in Switzerland and visited numerous new and established green roof sites including the famous ‘chicken shed meadow roof’. * The research fellow and Evans constructed nine purpose-built ‘test rigs’ comparing nine different green roof systems i.e. substrate/ no substrate, drainage/ no drainage, pre-grown planting/ seeded etc. including an empty flat roof control rig. An additional rig was set up to enable visual monitoring of the process of organic material breakdown. * The test rigs were monitored for cumulative rainfall over the duration of the KTP. * A further dynamic loading test saw the development of new saturation methodology which provided real-time evaluation of loadings of HayBase and alternative build-ups during 6 hour 1/100 year rainfall event. The novel contribution is itself the subject of a paper by Evans, Knights and a member of the Institute of Materials, Mr C Fentiman. * At the start and completion of the year-long research project key stakeholders and professionals were contacted and asked to take part in an on-line survey considering the benefits and challenges associated with green roofs. * Samples of substrate were sent to a Newcastle University research team working on ‘carbon capture gardens’ to test permanent carbonation by the ingredients of the commercial substrate of the CO2 in the straw and hay. * Samples of ‘haybase’ roofs at ages 0, 1, 1.5 and 3 years were dried and incinerated under lab conditions to test organic content (which relates to existing UK ordinances regarding fire safety of green roofing materials). Research Outputs The research has produced data from the two online surveys as well as findings from monitoring the nine test rigs and four commercial green roof installations that were between twelve months and four years established. This will be presented within our paper. The References and Sources ZHAW: Asphof, Rothenfluh (Canton Basel-Land) Brenneisen, S: New lightweight solutions for green roofs, paper to 10th Cities Alive Green Roof and Wall Congress, October 2012 Getter, Rowe, Roberston & Andresen - Carbon Sequestration potential of Extensive Green Roofs, Env Science Technology 2009, 43, 7564-7570 Washbourne, Lopez-Capal, Renforth, Ascough, Manning - Rapid Removal of Atmospheric CO2 by Urban Soils, Env Science Technology, 2015, 49, 5434-5440 GLA - London Sustainable Drainage Action Plan, Draft for Public Consultation, October 2015 GRO Code of practice for green roofs, 2014 version, www.greenroofcode.co.uk Gedge, Grant, Kardas, Dinham: Creating Green Roofs for Invertebrates: A Best Practice Guide,https://www.buglife.org.uk/sites/default/files/Creating{\%}20Green{\%}20Roofs{\%}20for{\%}20Invertebrates_Best{\%}20practice{\%}20guidance.pdf",
author = "Duncan Baker-Brown and Lee Evans",
note = "{\circledC} The Centre for Sustainable Design",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "16",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780954395094",
pages = "23--32",
booktitle = "Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference",
publisher = "The Centre for Sustainable Design",

}

Baker-Brown, D & Evans, L 2016, Investigating the benefits of Swiss lightweight organic meadow roofs in the green retrofit construction sector. in Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference. The Centre for Sustainable Design, University of the Creative Arts Farnham Surrey, pp. 23-32, Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference, 16/11/16.

Investigating the benefits of Swiss lightweight organic meadow roofs in the green retrofit construction sector. / Baker-Brown, Duncan; Evans, Lee.

Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference. University of the Creative Arts Farnham Surrey : The Centre for Sustainable Design, 2016. p. 23-32.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNConference contribution with ISSN or ISBN

TY - GEN

T1 - Investigating the benefits of Swiss lightweight organic meadow roofs in the green retrofit construction sector

AU - Baker-Brown, Duncan

AU - Evans, Lee

N1 - © The Centre for Sustainable Design

PY - 2016/11/16

Y1 - 2016/11/16

N2 - Premise: Are Swiss lightweight meadow roofs ready for the UK retrofit market? Basel City Council and others in Switzerland some years ago made it compulsory for all new buildings, and temporary buildings with an 18-month or longer lifetime, to include organic green roofs. The primary drivers were to reduce the impact of seasonal storms: green roofs are able to provide excellent water attenuation, and to promote biodiversity (urban areas are heavily developed in Switzerland because the mountainous terrain outside cities prevents sprawl). ZHAW (Zurich School of Applied Science) green roof research department has been given input into the design of green roofs even on commercial projects as stakeholders in the planning and Building Control process, and this has enabled them to undertake multiple experiments on public and commercial buildings into the viability of different lightweight build-ups, primarily in respect of the impact on vegetation. One in particular, which utilises locally available agricultural waste (china reed) to replace much of the heavy growing medium, has proven particularly successful. This approach currently has been replicated on many roofs including Basel central tram depot over the ensuing fifteen years. The University of Brighton’s Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) programme supported an emerging company ‘Organic Roofs Ltd’ to undertake research that built upon ZHAW plant monitoring, looking further into the potential benefits of these lightweight meadow green roof systems to be used on existing buildings: to satisfy the requirements of designers, contractors and occupants requiring a climate resilient refurbished building stock. The KTP team, including Baker-Brown and Evans, considered how the Swiss-inspired ‘haybase’ roofs compared with other and popular systems currently available in the UK (mainly Sedum roofs). They considered: * Water attenuation ability * The weight of roof systems when saturated * Levels of biodiversity & plant succession * The Longevity of vegetation * Evaluation of how the performance of roof systems varies over time, and its characteristics when stable * Levels of Carbon sequestration (from the straw itself and the atmosphere) * Material provenance and sustainable supply chain * Requirements for maintenance Research Approach The KTP team were assembled for a year with the objective of testing the ‘haybase’ lightweight meadow roof system as a viable commercial option to popular green roof systems. It comprised Evans who is an expert green roof contractor, Knights a full-time research fellow, plus Baker-Brown an architect and academic, and finally Dr. Anja Rott an academic botanist (both employed by the University of Brighton). The following research methods were employed: * The KTP team have been in regular communication with the research team at ZHAW whose research was focused on issues of the biodiversity of meadow roofs in urban environments * The KTP team met with ZHAW research team in Switzerland and visited numerous new and established green roof sites including the famous ‘chicken shed meadow roof’. * The research fellow and Evans constructed nine purpose-built ‘test rigs’ comparing nine different green roof systems i.e. substrate/ no substrate, drainage/ no drainage, pre-grown planting/ seeded etc. including an empty flat roof control rig. An additional rig was set up to enable visual monitoring of the process of organic material breakdown. * The test rigs were monitored for cumulative rainfall over the duration of the KTP. * A further dynamic loading test saw the development of new saturation methodology which provided real-time evaluation of loadings of HayBase and alternative build-ups during 6 hour 1/100 year rainfall event. The novel contribution is itself the subject of a paper by Evans, Knights and a member of the Institute of Materials, Mr C Fentiman. * At the start and completion of the year-long research project key stakeholders and professionals were contacted and asked to take part in an on-line survey considering the benefits and challenges associated with green roofs. * Samples of substrate were sent to a Newcastle University research team working on ‘carbon capture gardens’ to test permanent carbonation by the ingredients of the commercial substrate of the CO2 in the straw and hay. * Samples of ‘haybase’ roofs at ages 0, 1, 1.5 and 3 years were dried and incinerated under lab conditions to test organic content (which relates to existing UK ordinances regarding fire safety of green roofing materials). Research Outputs The research has produced data from the two online surveys as well as findings from monitoring the nine test rigs and four commercial green roof installations that were between twelve months and four years established. This will be presented within our paper. The References and Sources ZHAW: Asphof, Rothenfluh (Canton Basel-Land) Brenneisen, S: New lightweight solutions for green roofs, paper to 10th Cities Alive Green Roof and Wall Congress, October 2012 Getter, Rowe, Roberston & Andresen - Carbon Sequestration potential of Extensive Green Roofs, Env Science Technology 2009, 43, 7564-7570 Washbourne, Lopez-Capal, Renforth, Ascough, Manning - Rapid Removal of Atmospheric CO2 by Urban Soils, Env Science Technology, 2015, 49, 5434-5440 GLA - London Sustainable Drainage Action Plan, Draft for Public Consultation, October 2015 GRO Code of practice for green roofs, 2014 version, www.greenroofcode.co.uk Gedge, Grant, Kardas, Dinham: Creating Green Roofs for Invertebrates: A Best Practice Guide,https://www.buglife.org.uk/sites/default/files/Creating%20Green%20Roofs%20for%20Invertebrates_Best%20practice%20guidance.pdf

AB - Premise: Are Swiss lightweight meadow roofs ready for the UK retrofit market? Basel City Council and others in Switzerland some years ago made it compulsory for all new buildings, and temporary buildings with an 18-month or longer lifetime, to include organic green roofs. The primary drivers were to reduce the impact of seasonal storms: green roofs are able to provide excellent water attenuation, and to promote biodiversity (urban areas are heavily developed in Switzerland because the mountainous terrain outside cities prevents sprawl). ZHAW (Zurich School of Applied Science) green roof research department has been given input into the design of green roofs even on commercial projects as stakeholders in the planning and Building Control process, and this has enabled them to undertake multiple experiments on public and commercial buildings into the viability of different lightweight build-ups, primarily in respect of the impact on vegetation. One in particular, which utilises locally available agricultural waste (china reed) to replace much of the heavy growing medium, has proven particularly successful. This approach currently has been replicated on many roofs including Basel central tram depot over the ensuing fifteen years. The University of Brighton’s Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) programme supported an emerging company ‘Organic Roofs Ltd’ to undertake research that built upon ZHAW plant monitoring, looking further into the potential benefits of these lightweight meadow green roof systems to be used on existing buildings: to satisfy the requirements of designers, contractors and occupants requiring a climate resilient refurbished building stock. The KTP team, including Baker-Brown and Evans, considered how the Swiss-inspired ‘haybase’ roofs compared with other and popular systems currently available in the UK (mainly Sedum roofs). They considered: * Water attenuation ability * The weight of roof systems when saturated * Levels of biodiversity & plant succession * The Longevity of vegetation * Evaluation of how the performance of roof systems varies over time, and its characteristics when stable * Levels of Carbon sequestration (from the straw itself and the atmosphere) * Material provenance and sustainable supply chain * Requirements for maintenance Research Approach The KTP team were assembled for a year with the objective of testing the ‘haybase’ lightweight meadow roof system as a viable commercial option to popular green roof systems. It comprised Evans who is an expert green roof contractor, Knights a full-time research fellow, plus Baker-Brown an architect and academic, and finally Dr. Anja Rott an academic botanist (both employed by the University of Brighton). The following research methods were employed: * The KTP team have been in regular communication with the research team at ZHAW whose research was focused on issues of the biodiversity of meadow roofs in urban environments * The KTP team met with ZHAW research team in Switzerland and visited numerous new and established green roof sites including the famous ‘chicken shed meadow roof’. * The research fellow and Evans constructed nine purpose-built ‘test rigs’ comparing nine different green roof systems i.e. substrate/ no substrate, drainage/ no drainage, pre-grown planting/ seeded etc. including an empty flat roof control rig. An additional rig was set up to enable visual monitoring of the process of organic material breakdown. * The test rigs were monitored for cumulative rainfall over the duration of the KTP. * A further dynamic loading test saw the development of new saturation methodology which provided real-time evaluation of loadings of HayBase and alternative build-ups during 6 hour 1/100 year rainfall event. The novel contribution is itself the subject of a paper by Evans, Knights and a member of the Institute of Materials, Mr C Fentiman. * At the start and completion of the year-long research project key stakeholders and professionals were contacted and asked to take part in an on-line survey considering the benefits and challenges associated with green roofs. * Samples of substrate were sent to a Newcastle University research team working on ‘carbon capture gardens’ to test permanent carbonation by the ingredients of the commercial substrate of the CO2 in the straw and hay. * Samples of ‘haybase’ roofs at ages 0, 1, 1.5 and 3 years were dried and incinerated under lab conditions to test organic content (which relates to existing UK ordinances regarding fire safety of green roofing materials). Research Outputs The research has produced data from the two online surveys as well as findings from monitoring the nine test rigs and four commercial green roof installations that were between twelve months and four years established. This will be presented within our paper. The References and Sources ZHAW: Asphof, Rothenfluh (Canton Basel-Land) Brenneisen, S: New lightweight solutions for green roofs, paper to 10th Cities Alive Green Roof and Wall Congress, October 2012 Getter, Rowe, Roberston & Andresen - Carbon Sequestration potential of Extensive Green Roofs, Env Science Technology 2009, 43, 7564-7570 Washbourne, Lopez-Capal, Renforth, Ascough, Manning - Rapid Removal of Atmospheric CO2 by Urban Soils, Env Science Technology, 2015, 49, 5434-5440 GLA - London Sustainable Drainage Action Plan, Draft for Public Consultation, October 2015 GRO Code of practice for green roofs, 2014 version, www.greenroofcode.co.uk Gedge, Grant, Kardas, Dinham: Creating Green Roofs for Invertebrates: A Best Practice Guide,https://www.buglife.org.uk/sites/default/files/Creating%20Green%20Roofs%20for%20Invertebrates_Best%20practice%20guidance.pdf

M3 - Conference contribution with ISSN or ISBN

SN - 9780954395094

SP - 23

EP - 32

BT - Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference

PB - The Centre for Sustainable Design

CY - University of the Creative Arts Farnham Surrey

ER -

Baker-Brown D, Evans L. Investigating the benefits of Swiss lightweight organic meadow roofs in the green retrofit construction sector. In Sustainable Innovation 2016: Circular Economy Innovation Conference. University of the Creative Arts Farnham Surrey: The Centre for Sustainable Design. 2016. p. 23-32