Intersectionality queer studies and hybridity: Methodological frameworks for social research

Aristea Fotopoulou

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    This article seeks to draw links between intersectionality and queer studies as epistemological strands by examining their common methodological tasks and by tracing some similar difficulties of translating theory into research methods. Intersectionality is the systematic study of the ways in which differences such as race, gender, sexuality, class, ethnicity and other sociopolitical and cultural identities interrelate. Queer theory, when applied as a distinct methodological approach to the study of gender and sexuality, has sought to denaturalise categories of analysis and make normativity visible. By examining existing research projects framed as 'queer' alongside ones that use intersectionality, I consider the importance of positionality in research accounts. I revisit Judith Halberstam's (1998) 'Female Masculinity' and Gloria Anzaldua's (1987) 'Borderlands' and discuss the tension between the act of naming and the critical strategical adoption of categorical thinking. Finally, I suggest hybridity as one possible complementary methodological approach to those of intersectionality and queer studies. Hybridity can facilitate an understanding of shifting textual and material borders and can operate as a creative and political mode of destabilising not only complex social locations, but also research frameworks.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)19-32
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of International Women's Studies
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012


    • Hybridity
    • Intersectionality
    • Queer studies


    Dive into the research topics of 'Intersectionality queer studies and hybridity: Methodological frameworks for social research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this