Intersectionality queer studies and hybridity: Methodological frameworks for social research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article seeks to draw links between intersectionality and queer studies as epistemological strands by examining their common methodological tasks and by tracing some similar difficulties of translating theory into research methods. Intersectionality is the systematic study of the ways in which differences such as race, gender, sexuality, class, ethnicity and other sociopolitical and cultural identities interrelate. Queer theory, when applied as a distinct methodological approach to the study of gender and sexuality, has sought to denaturalise categories of analysis and make normativity visible. By examining existing research projects framed as 'queer' alongside ones that use intersectionality, I consider the importance of positionality in research accounts. I revisit Judith Halberstam's (1998) 'Female Masculinity' and Gloria Anzaldua's (1987) 'Borderlands' and discuss the tension between the act of naming and the critical strategical adoption of categorical thinking. Finally, I suggest hybridity as one possible complementary methodological approach to those of intersectionality and queer studies. Hybridity can facilitate an understanding of shifting textual and material borders and can operate as a creative and political mode of destabilising not only complex social locations, but also research frameworks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-32
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of International Women's Studies
Volume13
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012

Keywords

  • Hybridity
  • Intersectionality
  • Queer studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intersectionality queer studies and hybridity: Methodological frameworks for social research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this