Abstract
Historically, interjections have been treated in two different ways: as part of language, or as non-words signifying feelings or states of mind. In this paper, I assess the relative strengths and weaknesses of two contemporary approaches that reflect the historical dichotomy, and suggest a new analysis which preserves the insights of both. Interjections have a natural and a coded element, and are better analysed as falling at various points along a continu- um between ‘showing’ and ‘saying’. These two notions are characterised in theoretical terms, and some implications of the proposed approach are considered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-91 |
| Number of pages | 53 |
| Journal | Pragmatics and Cognition |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2003 |
Bibliographical note
© Under copyright, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any formFingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interjections, language and the 'showing/saying' continuum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver