This chapter explores the relation of forms of immobility to mobility, through examples relating to transnational migration, progress, labor, and the market. It provokes connections between anthropological readings of immobility’s spatio-temporal, political, economic, and human dimensions in these fields with wider developments in the social sciences. It additionally explores some intensities of passion (grief, hope, waiting, feeling stuck) generated in the valuation of immobility as both positive and negative. It argues for ways immobility can encompass modes of resistance, refusal, or freedom, or signal the painful limits of individual autonomy. One overarching question concerns ways the immobile becomes positioned as ‘either-or’ a form of life or death; some conceptualisations are proposed that might transcend these divisions.
|Title of host publication||Keywords of Mobility: Critical Engagements|
|Editors||N. Salazar, K. Jayaram|
|Place of Publication||New York and Oxford|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Jun 2016|
|Name||Worlds in Motion|
Bibliographical noteThis chapter appears in a larger collection published by Berghahn Books http://www.berghahnbooks.com/title.php?rowtag=SalazarKeywords. Khan, Nichola. 2015. “Immobility.” Keywords of Mobility: Critical Engagements, Noel B. Salazar and Kiran Jayaram (eds). New York: Berghahn Books.
- anthropology and mobilities
- School of Applied Social Science - Reader
- Care, Health and Emotional Wellbeing Research and Enterprise Group
- Centre for Memory, Narrative and Histories
- Centre for Spatial, Environmental and Cultural Politics
- Cities, Injustice and Resistance Research and Enterprise Group