This article examines activists' use of human rights as a discourse to contest the impacts of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games by drawing on a wider ethnographic project examining activism at Rio 2016. Focusing on two areas of contention, forced evictions and police brutality, the article considers the way activists framed their grievances and how mainstream international media outlets reported those grievances. While activists fighting against forced evictions explicitly used the language of rights in their activism, media accounts tended not to discuss these issues using this lexicon. Conversely, grassroots activists protesting around the issue of police brutality did not tend to frame their grievances in terms of rights, but these issues were discussed as human rights abuses in the media. This points to a dual role played by activists fighting forced evictions: while they are fighting to keep their own homes, they are also part of a wider discursive battle for the right to housing to be recognised and respected.
Bibliographical noteThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Leisure Studies on 17/04/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02614367.2017.1318162
- Rio de Janeiro
- human rights
- School of Sport and Service Management - Reader
- Sport and Leisure Cultures Research and Enterprise Group - Leader of REG
- Tourism, Hospitality and Events Research and Enterprise Group
- Centre for Memory, Narrative and Histories - Steering committee