From the hydrosocial to the hydrocitizen

water, place and subjectivity within emergent urban wetlands

Mary Gearey, Neil Ravenscroft, Andrew Church

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper argues that the expansion of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives within the English water sector, and in particular the opening up of privately-owned-public-spaces (POPS) in urban settings, have generated spatially fixed forms of human-environment relationships that we have termed ‘hydrocitizenships’. Utilising empirical fieldwork undertaken within an emergent wetland POPS, we suggest that these novel modes of citizen agency are primarily enacted through the performativity of volunteering, in multiple civic roles such as landscapers, citizen scientists, stewards and storytelling guides. Members of the local community thus effectively curate new civic subjectivities for themselves in response to the site and its organisation, by producing for themselves new modes of ‘hydrocitizenship’. These hybrid, intertwined forms of practice prompt us to ask questions about the extent to which these apparently new forms of environmental citizenship are self-directed; or manipulated. As access, control over, and use of, water resources are a synecdoche of structural power relationships within contemporary neoliberal economies, we can go further to suggest that these blue-green POPS are emblematic of a new iteration of hydro-social relations in which water, place and subjectivity become the collateral through which new POPS are secured. For water companies seeking to deploy CSR there is, then, a subtle two step move to be made, by building brand loyalty and then developing new forms of resource management in which local communities accept heightened levels of responsibility for sites to which they are offered recreational access. These emergent ‘hydrocitizenships’ thus encapsulate very specific geo-spatial subjectivities and performativities which lock in access to waterscapes with closely scripted conditionalities regarding activity and behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironment and Planning E: Nature and Space
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 7 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Wetlands
Public Space
Water
Subjectivity
Local Communities
Performativity
Civics
Corporate Social Responsibility
Power Relationships
Conditionality
Responsibility
Water Resources
Social Relations
Storytelling
Iteration
Field Work
Volunteering
Loyalty
Human Environment
Fixed Form

Keywords

  • hydrosocial
  • hydrocitizenships
  • environmental citizenship
  • urban wetlands
  • volunteering
  • governmentality
  • POPS

Cite this

@article{086368ca35d74afc954e4fe71b2f6e65,
title = "From the hydrosocial to the hydrocitizen: water, place and subjectivity within emergent urban wetlands",
abstract = "This paper argues that the expansion of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives within the English water sector, and in particular the opening up of privately-owned-public-spaces (POPS) in urban settings, have generated spatially fixed forms of human-environment relationships that we have termed ‘hydrocitizenships’. Utilising empirical fieldwork undertaken within an emergent wetland POPS, we suggest that these novel modes of citizen agency are primarily enacted through the performativity of volunteering, in multiple civic roles such as landscapers, citizen scientists, stewards and storytelling guides. Members of the local community thus effectively curate new civic subjectivities for themselves in response to the site and its organisation, by producing for themselves new modes of ‘hydrocitizenship’. These hybrid, intertwined forms of practice prompt us to ask questions about the extent to which these apparently new forms of environmental citizenship are self-directed; or manipulated. As access, control over, and use of, water resources are a synecdoche of structural power relationships within contemporary neoliberal economies, we can go further to suggest that these blue-green POPS are emblematic of a new iteration of hydro-social relations in which water, place and subjectivity become the collateral through which new POPS are secured. For water companies seeking to deploy CSR there is, then, a subtle two step move to be made, by building brand loyalty and then developing new forms of resource management in which local communities accept heightened levels of responsibility for sites to which they are offered recreational access. These emergent ‘hydrocitizenships’ thus encapsulate very specific geo-spatial subjectivities and performativities which lock in access to waterscapes with closely scripted conditionalities regarding activity and behaviour.",
keywords = "hydrosocial, hydrocitizenships, environmental citizenship, urban wetlands, volunteering, governmentality, POPS",
author = "Mary Gearey and Neil Ravenscroft and Andrew Church",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "7",
language = "English",
journal = "Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space",
issn = "2514-8486",

}

From the hydrosocial to the hydrocitizen : water, place and subjectivity within emergent urban wetlands. / Gearey, Mary; Ravenscroft, Neil; Church, Andrew.

In: Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 07.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - From the hydrosocial to the hydrocitizen

T2 - water, place and subjectivity within emergent urban wetlands

AU - Gearey, Mary

AU - Ravenscroft, Neil

AU - Church, Andrew

PY - 2019/2/7

Y1 - 2019/2/7

N2 - This paper argues that the expansion of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives within the English water sector, and in particular the opening up of privately-owned-public-spaces (POPS) in urban settings, have generated spatially fixed forms of human-environment relationships that we have termed ‘hydrocitizenships’. Utilising empirical fieldwork undertaken within an emergent wetland POPS, we suggest that these novel modes of citizen agency are primarily enacted through the performativity of volunteering, in multiple civic roles such as landscapers, citizen scientists, stewards and storytelling guides. Members of the local community thus effectively curate new civic subjectivities for themselves in response to the site and its organisation, by producing for themselves new modes of ‘hydrocitizenship’. These hybrid, intertwined forms of practice prompt us to ask questions about the extent to which these apparently new forms of environmental citizenship are self-directed; or manipulated. As access, control over, and use of, water resources are a synecdoche of structural power relationships within contemporary neoliberal economies, we can go further to suggest that these blue-green POPS are emblematic of a new iteration of hydro-social relations in which water, place and subjectivity become the collateral through which new POPS are secured. For water companies seeking to deploy CSR there is, then, a subtle two step move to be made, by building brand loyalty and then developing new forms of resource management in which local communities accept heightened levels of responsibility for sites to which they are offered recreational access. These emergent ‘hydrocitizenships’ thus encapsulate very specific geo-spatial subjectivities and performativities which lock in access to waterscapes with closely scripted conditionalities regarding activity and behaviour.

AB - This paper argues that the expansion of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives within the English water sector, and in particular the opening up of privately-owned-public-spaces (POPS) in urban settings, have generated spatially fixed forms of human-environment relationships that we have termed ‘hydrocitizenships’. Utilising empirical fieldwork undertaken within an emergent wetland POPS, we suggest that these novel modes of citizen agency are primarily enacted through the performativity of volunteering, in multiple civic roles such as landscapers, citizen scientists, stewards and storytelling guides. Members of the local community thus effectively curate new civic subjectivities for themselves in response to the site and its organisation, by producing for themselves new modes of ‘hydrocitizenship’. These hybrid, intertwined forms of practice prompt us to ask questions about the extent to which these apparently new forms of environmental citizenship are self-directed; or manipulated. As access, control over, and use of, water resources are a synecdoche of structural power relationships within contemporary neoliberal economies, we can go further to suggest that these blue-green POPS are emblematic of a new iteration of hydro-social relations in which water, place and subjectivity become the collateral through which new POPS are secured. For water companies seeking to deploy CSR there is, then, a subtle two step move to be made, by building brand loyalty and then developing new forms of resource management in which local communities accept heightened levels of responsibility for sites to which they are offered recreational access. These emergent ‘hydrocitizenships’ thus encapsulate very specific geo-spatial subjectivities and performativities which lock in access to waterscapes with closely scripted conditionalities regarding activity and behaviour.

KW - hydrosocial

KW - hydrocitizenships

KW - environmental citizenship

KW - urban wetlands

KW - volunteering

KW - governmentality

KW - POPS

M3 - Article

JO - Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space

JF - Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space

SN - 2514-8486

ER -