Abstract
Archaeology and Heritage Management are often understood to be
related but distinct disciplines, however, in recent years, the conservation,
management and preservation of archaeological sites and objects have also
between practical archaeology—which remains limited to excavation and
exploration in several countries, and heritage management—which is still
understood to be a bureaucratic activity, sometimes undertaken by private
stakeholders. This is particularly true for countries like India, where, as a
consequence of this divide, archaeological activity and heritage management
take place without consideration for each other and a large number of
excavations are carried out without proper post-excavation management plans
on the one hand, and conservation and management plan for sites created
without consulting archaeologists, on the other. This paper examines how
a comprehensive plan can be developed when Heritage Management and
Archaeology are brought together using the case study of Bhima Devi Temple in North Haryana, India.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Rethinking the Archaeology–Heritage Divide |
Volume | 37 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 May 2022 |
Keywords
- bureaucracy
- India
- archaeological management
- heritage management