Abstract
The way that public involvement in research has been evaluated as a complex intervention has derailed the development of an evidence base. Two alternative approaches are available for constructing and evaluating patient involvement, each of which requires us to revisit the purposes and values that underpin it in each stage of the research process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 209-211 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Services Research & Policy |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Oct 2015 |
Bibliographical note
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).Keywords
- Public involvement
- evaluation
- complex intervention
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of public involvement in research: time for a major re-think?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Natalie Edelman
- Care, Health and Emotional Wellbeing Research and Enterprise Group
- Centre for Digital Cultures and Innovation
- Centre for Secure, Intelligent and Usable Systems
- Centre for Transforming Sexuality and Gender
- Centre of Resilience for Social Justice
- Public Health and Wellbeing Research and Enterprise Group
Person: Academic