Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability

Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Maya Groff, Peter Tamas, Arthur Dahl, Marie Harder, Graham Hassall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The entry into force of the Paris Agreement on climate change brings expectations that states will be held to account for their commitments. The article elaborates on why this is not a realistic assumption unless a broader multilevel perspective is taken on the nature of accountability regimes for international (legal) agreements. The formal accountability mechanisms of such agreements tend to be weak, and there are no indications that they will be stronger for the recent global goals adopted in the Paris Agreement. Looking beyond only peer review among states, national institutions, direct civil society engagement and internal government processes - while each coming with their own strengths and weaknesses - provide additional accountability pathways that together may do a better job. Scientific enquiry is, however, required to better understand, support and find improved mixtures of, and perhaps to move beyond, these accountability pathways. Policy relevance: This perspective provides something of a clarion call for a variety of different types of actors at both global and national levels to engage in ensuring that states keep the promises they made in the Paris Agreement. It particularly highlights the importance of national institutions and civil society to step up to the task in the present world order, where states are reluctant to build strong accountability regimes at the global level.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-599
Number of pages7
JournalClimate Policy
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2018

Fingerprint

responsibility
civil society
legal agreement
regime
world order
peer review
indication
climate change
commitment
present

Bibliographical note

© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • climate change policy
  • global governance
  • states
  • transparency

Cite this

Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Groff, M., Tamas, P., Dahl, A., Harder, M., & Hassall, G. (2018). Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability. Climate Policy, 18(5), 593-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1331904
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia ; Groff, Maya ; Tamas, Peter ; Dahl, Arthur ; Harder, Marie ; Hassall, Graham. / Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability. In: Climate Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 593-599.
@article{5ace5d313b694caa8ae830ca1e0b66da,
title = "Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability",
abstract = "The entry into force of the Paris Agreement on climate change brings expectations that states will be held to account for their commitments. The article elaborates on why this is not a realistic assumption unless a broader multilevel perspective is taken on the nature of accountability regimes for international (legal) agreements. The formal accountability mechanisms of such agreements tend to be weak, and there are no indications that they will be stronger for the recent global goals adopted in the Paris Agreement. Looking beyond only peer review among states, national institutions, direct civil society engagement and internal government processes - while each coming with their own strengths and weaknesses - provide additional accountability pathways that together may do a better job. Scientific enquiry is, however, required to better understand, support and find improved mixtures of, and perhaps to move beyond, these accountability pathways. Policy relevance: This perspective provides something of a clarion call for a variety of different types of actors at both global and national levels to engage in ensuring that states keep the promises they made in the Paris Agreement. It particularly highlights the importance of national institutions and civil society to step up to the task in the present world order, where states are reluctant to build strong accountability regimes at the global level.",
keywords = "Accountability, climate change policy, global governance, states, transparency",
author = "Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen and Maya Groff and Peter Tamas and Arthur Dahl and Marie Harder and Graham Hassall",
note = "{\circledC} 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/14693062.2017.1331904",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "593--599",
journal = "Climate Policy",
issn = "1469-3062",
number = "5",

}

Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S, Groff, M, Tamas, P, Dahl, A, Harder, M & Hassall, G 2018, 'Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability', Climate Policy, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 593-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1331904

Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability. / Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia; Groff, Maya; Tamas, Peter; Dahl, Arthur; Harder, Marie; Hassall, Graham.

In: Climate Policy, Vol. 18, No. 5, 28.05.2018, p. 593-599.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability

AU - Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia

AU - Groff, Maya

AU - Tamas, Peter

AU - Dahl, Arthur

AU - Harder, Marie

AU - Hassall, Graham

N1 - © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.

PY - 2018/5/28

Y1 - 2018/5/28

N2 - The entry into force of the Paris Agreement on climate change brings expectations that states will be held to account for their commitments. The article elaborates on why this is not a realistic assumption unless a broader multilevel perspective is taken on the nature of accountability regimes for international (legal) agreements. The formal accountability mechanisms of such agreements tend to be weak, and there are no indications that they will be stronger for the recent global goals adopted in the Paris Agreement. Looking beyond only peer review among states, national institutions, direct civil society engagement and internal government processes - while each coming with their own strengths and weaknesses - provide additional accountability pathways that together may do a better job. Scientific enquiry is, however, required to better understand, support and find improved mixtures of, and perhaps to move beyond, these accountability pathways. Policy relevance: This perspective provides something of a clarion call for a variety of different types of actors at both global and national levels to engage in ensuring that states keep the promises they made in the Paris Agreement. It particularly highlights the importance of national institutions and civil society to step up to the task in the present world order, where states are reluctant to build strong accountability regimes at the global level.

AB - The entry into force of the Paris Agreement on climate change brings expectations that states will be held to account for their commitments. The article elaborates on why this is not a realistic assumption unless a broader multilevel perspective is taken on the nature of accountability regimes for international (legal) agreements. The formal accountability mechanisms of such agreements tend to be weak, and there are no indications that they will be stronger for the recent global goals adopted in the Paris Agreement. Looking beyond only peer review among states, national institutions, direct civil society engagement and internal government processes - while each coming with their own strengths and weaknesses - provide additional accountability pathways that together may do a better job. Scientific enquiry is, however, required to better understand, support and find improved mixtures of, and perhaps to move beyond, these accountability pathways. Policy relevance: This perspective provides something of a clarion call for a variety of different types of actors at both global and national levels to engage in ensuring that states keep the promises they made in the Paris Agreement. It particularly highlights the importance of national institutions and civil society to step up to the task in the present world order, where states are reluctant to build strong accountability regimes at the global level.

KW - Accountability

KW - climate change policy

KW - global governance

KW - states

KW - transparency

U2 - 10.1080/14693062.2017.1331904

DO - 10.1080/14693062.2017.1331904

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 593

EP - 599

JO - Climate Policy

JF - Climate Policy

SN - 1469-3062

IS - 5

ER -