Enclosing Autonomy

The politics of tolerance and criminalisation of the Amsterdam squatting movement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In the Netherlands squatting was tolerated and regulated for decades. In October 2010 a new law turned the occupation of vacant properties into a criminal action punishable with up to two years imprisonment. This paper argues that while squatted spaces produce autonomous forms of urban commoning, both tolerance and criminalisation of squatting engendered multiple modes of enclosure and capture of the autonomous socio-spatial relations constituted through these spaces. By analysing techniques of disciplinary inte-gration, commodification and criminalisation, the paper suggests that the object of enclosure is not simply the common as such, but its radical capacity for autonomy from state control and capital capture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-188
Number of pages19
JournalCity
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2019

Fingerprint

criminalization
tolerance
autonomy
politics
government supervision
imprisonment
occupation
Netherlands
Law

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in City on 22/05/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13604813.2019.1615760

Keywords

  • Criminalisation
  • Squatting
  • Autonomy
  • Tolerance
  • Housing
  • Social Movements
  • Protest
  • squatting
  • urban common
  • criminalisation
  • autonomy
  • new enclosures
  • tolerance

Cite this

@article{ff584894db9c4cc4adfff2a7f6d44c07,
title = "Enclosing Autonomy: The politics of tolerance and criminalisation of the Amsterdam squatting movement",
abstract = "In the Netherlands squatting was tolerated and regulated for decades. In October 2010 a new law turned the occupation of vacant properties into a criminal action punishable with up to two years imprisonment. This paper argues that while squatted spaces produce autonomous forms of urban commoning, both tolerance and criminalisation of squatting engendered multiple modes of enclosure and capture of the autonomous socio-spatial relations constituted through these spaces. By analysing techniques of disciplinary inte-gration, commodification and criminalisation, the paper suggests that the object of enclosure is not simply the common as such, but its radical capacity for autonomy from state control and capital capture.",
keywords = "Criminalisation, Squatting, Autonomy, Tolerance, Housing, Social Movements, Protest, squatting, urban common, criminalisation, autonomy, new enclosures, tolerance",
author = "Deanna Dadusc",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in City on 22/05/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13604813.2019.1615760",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/13604813.2019.1615760",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "170--188",
journal = "City",
issn = "1360-4813",
number = "2",

}

Enclosing Autonomy : The politics of tolerance and criminalisation of the Amsterdam squatting movement. / Dadusc, Deanna.

In: City, Vol. 23, No. 2, 22.05.2019, p. 170-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enclosing Autonomy

T2 - The politics of tolerance and criminalisation of the Amsterdam squatting movement

AU - Dadusc, Deanna

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in City on 22/05/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13604813.2019.1615760

PY - 2019/5/22

Y1 - 2019/5/22

N2 - In the Netherlands squatting was tolerated and regulated for decades. In October 2010 a new law turned the occupation of vacant properties into a criminal action punishable with up to two years imprisonment. This paper argues that while squatted spaces produce autonomous forms of urban commoning, both tolerance and criminalisation of squatting engendered multiple modes of enclosure and capture of the autonomous socio-spatial relations constituted through these spaces. By analysing techniques of disciplinary inte-gration, commodification and criminalisation, the paper suggests that the object of enclosure is not simply the common as such, but its radical capacity for autonomy from state control and capital capture.

AB - In the Netherlands squatting was tolerated and regulated for decades. In October 2010 a new law turned the occupation of vacant properties into a criminal action punishable with up to two years imprisonment. This paper argues that while squatted spaces produce autonomous forms of urban commoning, both tolerance and criminalisation of squatting engendered multiple modes of enclosure and capture of the autonomous socio-spatial relations constituted through these spaces. By analysing techniques of disciplinary inte-gration, commodification and criminalisation, the paper suggests that the object of enclosure is not simply the common as such, but its radical capacity for autonomy from state control and capital capture.

KW - Criminalisation

KW - Squatting

KW - Autonomy

KW - Tolerance

KW - Housing

KW - Social Movements

KW - Protest

KW - squatting

KW - urban common

KW - criminalisation

KW - autonomy

KW - new enclosures

KW - tolerance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066883911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13604813.2019.1615760

DO - 10.1080/13604813.2019.1615760

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 170

EP - 188

JO - City

JF - City

SN - 1360-4813

IS - 2

ER -