Enclosing Autonomy: The politics of tolerance and criminalisation of the Amsterdam squatting movement

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In the Netherlands squatting was tolerated and regulated for decades. In October 2010 a new law turned the occupation of vacant properties into a criminal action punishable with up to two years imprisonment. This paper argues that while squatted spaces produce autonomous forms of urban commoning, both tolerance and criminalisation of squatting engendered multiple modes of enclosure and capture of the autonomous socio-spatial relations constituted through these spaces. By analysing techniques of disciplinary inte-gration, commodification and criminalisation, the paper suggests that the object of enclosure is not simply the common as such, but its radical capacity for autonomy from state control and capital capture.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)170-188
    Number of pages19
    JournalCity
    Volume23
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2019

    Bibliographical note

    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in City on 22/05/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13604813.2019.1615760

    Keywords

    • Criminalisation
    • Squatting
    • Autonomy
    • Tolerance
    • Housing
    • Social Movements
    • Protest
    • squatting
    • urban common
    • criminalisation
    • autonomy
    • new enclosures
    • tolerance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Enclosing Autonomy: The politics of tolerance and criminalisation of the Amsterdam squatting movement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this