Effects of cyanobacterial soil crusts on surface roughness and splash erosion

Joanna Bullard, Anne Ockelford, Craig Strong, Helene Aubault

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Soil surface roughness (SSR) modifies interactions and feedback processes between terrestrial 20 and atmospheric systems driven by both the abiotic and biotic components of soils. This paper 21 compares SSR response to a low intensity multi-day rainfall event for soils with and without 22 early successional stage cyanobacteria-dominated biological soil crusts (CBCs). A rainfall 23 simulator was used to apply 2 mm, 5 mm and 2 mm of rain separated by a 24-hour period over 3 days at an intensity of 60 mm hr-124 . Changes in SSR were quantified using geostatistically25 derived indicators calculated from semivariogram analysis of high resolution laser scans. The 26 CBCs were stronger and splash erosion substantially less than from the physical soil crusts. 27 Prior to rainfall treatment soils with CBCs had greater SSR than those without. The rainfall 28 treatments caused the physical crusted soils to increase SSR and spatial patterning due to the 29 translocation of particles, soil loss and the development of raindrop impact craters. Rainfall 30 caused swelling of cyanobacterial filaments but only a slight increase in SSR, and raindrop 31 impact cratering and splash loss were low on the soils with CBCs.There is no relationship 32 between random roughness and splash erosion, but an increase in splash loss was associated with 33 an increase in topographic roughness and small-scale spatial patterning. A comparison of this 34 study with other research indicates that for rainfall events up to 100 mm the effectiveness of 35 CBCs in reducing soil loss is >80% regardless of the rainfall amount and intensity which 36 highlights their importance for landscape stabilization.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

soil crust
surface roughness
erosion
soil surface
cyanobacterium
soil
rainfall
roughness
cratering
effect
raindrop
translocation
swelling
crater
simulator
stabilization
laser
loss

Bibliographical note

An edited version of this paper was published by AGU. Copyright (2018) American Geophysical Union. Bullard, J. E., Ockelford, A., Strong, C., & Aubault, H. (2018). Effects of cyanobacterial soil crusts on surface roughness and splash erosion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 123. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004726. To view the published open abstract, go to http://dx.doi.org and enter the DOI.

Cite this

@article{a7f0d3c3912e4903b4ebc8be30beb284,
title = "Effects of cyanobacterial soil crusts on surface roughness and splash erosion",
abstract = "Soil surface roughness (SSR) modifies interactions and feedback processes between terrestrial 20 and atmospheric systems driven by both the abiotic and biotic components of soils. This paper 21 compares SSR response to a low intensity multi-day rainfall event for soils with and without 22 early successional stage cyanobacteria-dominated biological soil crusts (CBCs). A rainfall 23 simulator was used to apply 2 mm, 5 mm and 2 mm of rain separated by a 24-hour period over 3 days at an intensity of 60 mm hr-124 . Changes in SSR were quantified using geostatistically25 derived indicators calculated from semivariogram analysis of high resolution laser scans. The 26 CBCs were stronger and splash erosion substantially less than from the physical soil crusts. 27 Prior to rainfall treatment soils with CBCs had greater SSR than those without. The rainfall 28 treatments caused the physical crusted soils to increase SSR and spatial patterning due to the 29 translocation of particles, soil loss and the development of raindrop impact craters. Rainfall 30 caused swelling of cyanobacterial filaments but only a slight increase in SSR, and raindrop 31 impact cratering and splash loss were low on the soils with CBCs.There is no relationship 32 between random roughness and splash erosion, but an increase in splash loss was associated with 33 an increase in topographic roughness and small-scale spatial patterning. A comparison of this 34 study with other research indicates that for rainfall events up to 100 mm the effectiveness of 35 CBCs in reducing soil loss is >80{\%} regardless of the rainfall amount and intensity which 36 highlights their importance for landscape stabilization.",
author = "Joanna Bullard and Anne Ockelford and Craig Strong and Helene Aubault",
note = "An edited version of this paper was published by AGU. Copyright (2018) American Geophysical Union. Bullard, J. E., Ockelford, A., Strong, C., & Aubault, H. (2018). Effects of cyanobacterial soil crusts on surface roughness and splash erosion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 123. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004726. To view the published open abstract, go to http://dx.doi.org and enter the DOI.",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1029/2018JG004726",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences",
issn = "2169-8961",
publisher = "Wiley",

}

Effects of cyanobacterial soil crusts on surface roughness and splash erosion. / Bullard, Joanna; Ockelford, Anne; Strong, Craig; Aubault, Helene.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 06.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of cyanobacterial soil crusts on surface roughness and splash erosion

AU - Bullard, Joanna

AU - Ockelford, Anne

AU - Strong, Craig

AU - Aubault, Helene

N1 - An edited version of this paper was published by AGU. Copyright (2018) American Geophysical Union. Bullard, J. E., Ockelford, A., Strong, C., & Aubault, H. (2018). Effects of cyanobacterial soil crusts on surface roughness and splash erosion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 123. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004726. To view the published open abstract, go to http://dx.doi.org and enter the DOI.

PY - 2018/12/6

Y1 - 2018/12/6

N2 - Soil surface roughness (SSR) modifies interactions and feedback processes between terrestrial 20 and atmospheric systems driven by both the abiotic and biotic components of soils. This paper 21 compares SSR response to a low intensity multi-day rainfall event for soils with and without 22 early successional stage cyanobacteria-dominated biological soil crusts (CBCs). A rainfall 23 simulator was used to apply 2 mm, 5 mm and 2 mm of rain separated by a 24-hour period over 3 days at an intensity of 60 mm hr-124 . Changes in SSR were quantified using geostatistically25 derived indicators calculated from semivariogram analysis of high resolution laser scans. The 26 CBCs were stronger and splash erosion substantially less than from the physical soil crusts. 27 Prior to rainfall treatment soils with CBCs had greater SSR than those without. The rainfall 28 treatments caused the physical crusted soils to increase SSR and spatial patterning due to the 29 translocation of particles, soil loss and the development of raindrop impact craters. Rainfall 30 caused swelling of cyanobacterial filaments but only a slight increase in SSR, and raindrop 31 impact cratering and splash loss were low on the soils with CBCs.There is no relationship 32 between random roughness and splash erosion, but an increase in splash loss was associated with 33 an increase in topographic roughness and small-scale spatial patterning. A comparison of this 34 study with other research indicates that for rainfall events up to 100 mm the effectiveness of 35 CBCs in reducing soil loss is >80% regardless of the rainfall amount and intensity which 36 highlights their importance for landscape stabilization.

AB - Soil surface roughness (SSR) modifies interactions and feedback processes between terrestrial 20 and atmospheric systems driven by both the abiotic and biotic components of soils. This paper 21 compares SSR response to a low intensity multi-day rainfall event for soils with and without 22 early successional stage cyanobacteria-dominated biological soil crusts (CBCs). A rainfall 23 simulator was used to apply 2 mm, 5 mm and 2 mm of rain separated by a 24-hour period over 3 days at an intensity of 60 mm hr-124 . Changes in SSR were quantified using geostatistically25 derived indicators calculated from semivariogram analysis of high resolution laser scans. The 26 CBCs were stronger and splash erosion substantially less than from the physical soil crusts. 27 Prior to rainfall treatment soils with CBCs had greater SSR than those without. The rainfall 28 treatments caused the physical crusted soils to increase SSR and spatial patterning due to the 29 translocation of particles, soil loss and the development of raindrop impact craters. Rainfall 30 caused swelling of cyanobacterial filaments but only a slight increase in SSR, and raindrop 31 impact cratering and splash loss were low on the soils with CBCs.There is no relationship 32 between random roughness and splash erosion, but an increase in splash loss was associated with 33 an increase in topographic roughness and small-scale spatial patterning. A comparison of this 34 study with other research indicates that for rainfall events up to 100 mm the effectiveness of 35 CBCs in reducing soil loss is >80% regardless of the rainfall amount and intensity which 36 highlights their importance for landscape stabilization.

U2 - 10.1029/2018JG004726

DO - 10.1029/2018JG004726

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences

SN - 2169-8961

ER -