Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity

A. Hargreaves, Ivor Goodson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article presents the conceptual framework, methodological design, and key research findings from a Spencer Foundation-funded project of long-term educational change over time. Based on more than 200 interviews, supplementary observations, and extensive archival data, it examines perceptions and experiences of educational change in eight high schools in the USA and Canada among teachers and administrators who worked in the schools in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. The article indicates that most mainstream educational change theory and practice in the field of educational administration neglects the political, historical, and longitudinal aspects of change to their detriment. Educational change, it finds, is shaped by the convergence of large-scale economic and demographic shifts that produce five change forces (waves of reform, changing student demographics, teacher generations, leadership succession, and school interrelations) that have defined three distinct periods of educational change during the past 30 years. These forces and their convergence have ultimately reaffirmed the traditional identities and practices of conventional high schools and pulled innovative ones back toward the traditional norm in an age of standardization (although to a lesser extent where the schools are professional learning communities or have an activist orientation). Conclusions are drawn in the form of a strategic theory of sustainable change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-41
Number of pages39
JournalEducational Administration Quarterly
Volume42
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

Keywords

  • educational change
  • secondary education
  • sustainability
  • standards-based reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this