Double Skin Façades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-Domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective

Francesco Pomponi, Poorang Piroozfar, Eric R.P. Farr

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNConference contribution with ISSN or ISBNResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In developed countries, existing buildings have the biggest share in the building stock. Giventhe age of construction, the property vs. land values, and their slow replacement rate, lowcarbonrefurbishments are arguably one of the most sensible ways to mitigate environmentalimpacts (EIs) in the construction sector and meet the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets.In this respect, Double Skin Façade (DSF) has been defined as one of the most effective ways toefficiently manage interactions between outdoors and indoors, and its benefits span frompassive heating and cooling to the enhancement of thermal comfort of the occupied spaces. Aplethora of research does exist on the operational behaviour of the DSF. However, life cycleenergy figures and EIs are yet to be established fully and comprehensively. This paper reportson findings of an on-going research project aimed at filling such a gap. More specifically, lifecycle assessment (LCA) and building energy modelling (BEM) have been combined to build amethodology to help assess life cycle energy figures in a more holistic manner. Primary datahas been collected from manufacturers from across Europe about all the life cycle stages andprocesses related to a DSF refurbishment. Results show that if on the one hand the life cycleenergy balance actually is negative, hence supporting a wider adoption of DSFs inrefurbishments, on the other hand there exists ecological and EIs that the DSF bears; thatcannot be easily overlooked if a more responsive approach to the EIs is to be undertaken. Notonly do these findings inform a more energy-efficient deployment of DSFs, but they alsohighlight the need for a more holistic and impact-driven design approach to ensure that theenvironmental burdens are not just shifted from one impact category to another.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015
Place of PublicationLeeds, UK
PublisherLeeds Beckett University
Pages432-444
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - 17 Sep 2015
EventProceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015 - Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
Duration: 17 Sep 2015 → …

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015
Period17/09/15 → …

Fingerprint

refurbishment
skin
environmental impact
life cycle
energy
greenhouse gas
replacement
heating
cooling
modeling

Keywords

  • Double Skin Façade
  • Office Refurbishment
  • Low-carbon Refurbishments
  • Life Cycle Assessment

Cite this

Pomponi, F., Piroozfar, P., & Farr, E. R. P. (2015). Double Skin Façades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-Domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective. In Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015 (pp. 432-444). Leeds, UK: Leeds Beckett University.
Pomponi, Francesco ; Piroozfar, Poorang ; Farr, Eric R.P. / Double Skin Façades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-Domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective. Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015. Leeds, UK : Leeds Beckett University, 2015. pp. 432-444
@inproceedings{bcc62bd60737431e8a87936a76b0e675,
title = "Double Skin Fa{\cc}ades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-Domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective",
abstract = "In developed countries, existing buildings have the biggest share in the building stock. Giventhe age of construction, the property vs. land values, and their slow replacement rate, lowcarbonrefurbishments are arguably one of the most sensible ways to mitigate environmentalimpacts (EIs) in the construction sector and meet the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets.In this respect, Double Skin Fa{\cc}ade (DSF) has been defined as one of the most effective ways toefficiently manage interactions between outdoors and indoors, and its benefits span frompassive heating and cooling to the enhancement of thermal comfort of the occupied spaces. Aplethora of research does exist on the operational behaviour of the DSF. However, life cycleenergy figures and EIs are yet to be established fully and comprehensively. This paper reportson findings of an on-going research project aimed at filling such a gap. More specifically, lifecycle assessment (LCA) and building energy modelling (BEM) have been combined to build amethodology to help assess life cycle energy figures in a more holistic manner. Primary datahas been collected from manufacturers from across Europe about all the life cycle stages andprocesses related to a DSF refurbishment. Results show that if on the one hand the life cycleenergy balance actually is negative, hence supporting a wider adoption of DSFs inrefurbishments, on the other hand there exists ecological and EIs that the DSF bears; thatcannot be easily overlooked if a more responsive approach to the EIs is to be undertaken. Notonly do these findings inform a more energy-efficient deployment of DSFs, but they alsohighlight the need for a more holistic and impact-driven design approach to ensure that theenvironmental burdens are not just shifted from one impact category to another.",
keywords = "Double Skin Fa{\cc}ade, Office Refurbishment, Low-carbon Refurbishments, Life Cycle Assessment",
author = "Francesco Pomponi and Poorang Piroozfar and Farr, {Eric R.P.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "17",
language = "English",
pages = "432--444",
booktitle = "Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015",
publisher = "Leeds Beckett University",

}

Pomponi, F, Piroozfar, P & Farr, ERP 2015, Double Skin Façades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-Domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective. in Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015. Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK, pp. 432-444, Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015, 17/09/15.

Double Skin Façades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-Domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective. / Pomponi, Francesco; Piroozfar, Poorang; Farr, Eric R.P.

Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015. Leeds, UK : Leeds Beckett University, 2015. p. 432-444.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNConference contribution with ISSN or ISBNResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Double Skin Façades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-Domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective

AU - Pomponi, Francesco

AU - Piroozfar, Poorang

AU - Farr, Eric R.P.

PY - 2015/9/17

Y1 - 2015/9/17

N2 - In developed countries, existing buildings have the biggest share in the building stock. Giventhe age of construction, the property vs. land values, and their slow replacement rate, lowcarbonrefurbishments are arguably one of the most sensible ways to mitigate environmentalimpacts (EIs) in the construction sector and meet the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets.In this respect, Double Skin Façade (DSF) has been defined as one of the most effective ways toefficiently manage interactions between outdoors and indoors, and its benefits span frompassive heating and cooling to the enhancement of thermal comfort of the occupied spaces. Aplethora of research does exist on the operational behaviour of the DSF. However, life cycleenergy figures and EIs are yet to be established fully and comprehensively. This paper reportson findings of an on-going research project aimed at filling such a gap. More specifically, lifecycle assessment (LCA) and building energy modelling (BEM) have been combined to build amethodology to help assess life cycle energy figures in a more holistic manner. Primary datahas been collected from manufacturers from across Europe about all the life cycle stages andprocesses related to a DSF refurbishment. Results show that if on the one hand the life cycleenergy balance actually is negative, hence supporting a wider adoption of DSFs inrefurbishments, on the other hand there exists ecological and EIs that the DSF bears; thatcannot be easily overlooked if a more responsive approach to the EIs is to be undertaken. Notonly do these findings inform a more energy-efficient deployment of DSFs, but they alsohighlight the need for a more holistic and impact-driven design approach to ensure that theenvironmental burdens are not just shifted from one impact category to another.

AB - In developed countries, existing buildings have the biggest share in the building stock. Giventhe age of construction, the property vs. land values, and their slow replacement rate, lowcarbonrefurbishments are arguably one of the most sensible ways to mitigate environmentalimpacts (EIs) in the construction sector and meet the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets.In this respect, Double Skin Façade (DSF) has been defined as one of the most effective ways toefficiently manage interactions between outdoors and indoors, and its benefits span frompassive heating and cooling to the enhancement of thermal comfort of the occupied spaces. Aplethora of research does exist on the operational behaviour of the DSF. However, life cycleenergy figures and EIs are yet to be established fully and comprehensively. This paper reportson findings of an on-going research project aimed at filling such a gap. More specifically, lifecycle assessment (LCA) and building energy modelling (BEM) have been combined to build amethodology to help assess life cycle energy figures in a more holistic manner. Primary datahas been collected from manufacturers from across Europe about all the life cycle stages andprocesses related to a DSF refurbishment. Results show that if on the one hand the life cycleenergy balance actually is negative, hence supporting a wider adoption of DSFs inrefurbishments, on the other hand there exists ecological and EIs that the DSF bears; thatcannot be easily overlooked if a more responsive approach to the EIs is to be undertaken. Notonly do these findings inform a more energy-efficient deployment of DSFs, but they alsohighlight the need for a more holistic and impact-driven design approach to ensure that theenvironmental burdens are not just shifted from one impact category to another.

KW - Double Skin Façade

KW - Office Refurbishment

KW - Low-carbon Refurbishments

KW - Life Cycle Assessment

M3 - Conference contribution with ISSN or ISBN

SP - 432

EP - 444

BT - Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015

PB - Leeds Beckett University

CY - Leeds, UK

ER -

Pomponi F, Piroozfar P, Farr ERP. Double Skin Façades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-Domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective. In Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) Conference 2015. Leeds, UK: Leeds Beckett University. 2015. p. 432-444