Donor population size rather than local adaptation can be a key determinant of amphibian translocation success

Inga Zeisset, T.J.C. Beebee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Translocation of species to new locations is a widespread procedure in conservationbiology. Conventional wisdom suggests using large numbers of donor stockfrom sites as close and as ecologically similar to the recipient location as possibleto minimise risks from maladaptation and outbreeding depression. Here, wecompare translocation success to a common receptor site of animals from a largebut distant population with those from smaller proximal populations. Commontoads (Bufo bufo) from a site far from the recipient locality and with very differenthabitat rapidly established a new population where three attempts with localanimals failed. After 10 years, the new population retained allele frequency distributionsat microsatellite loci almost the same as the donor site, whereas majorhistocompatibility complex allele frequencies changed to resemble local ones.Variations in phenology and climate could not readily explain the success of thedistant translocation source. We postulate that success was due to the very largesize of the donor population compared with local sources, implying that highlevels of mean fitness or adaptive variation can be more important than localfactors when considering translocations, at least in some circumstances.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-366
Number of pages8
JournalAnimal Conservation
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

local adaptation
translocation
amphibian
population size
allele
phenology
fitness
animal
climate

Bibliographical note

© 2012 The Zoological Society of London

Keywords

  • translocation
  • amphibian
  • genetics
  • phenology
  • donor population size

Cite this

@article{779efcc6a01a41dda1bd03e699ac03c7,
title = "Donor population size rather than local adaptation can be a key determinant of amphibian translocation success",
abstract = "Translocation of species to new locations is a widespread procedure in conservationbiology. Conventional wisdom suggests using large numbers of donor stockfrom sites as close and as ecologically similar to the recipient location as possibleto minimise risks from maladaptation and outbreeding depression. Here, wecompare translocation success to a common receptor site of animals from a largebut distant population with those from smaller proximal populations. Commontoads (Bufo bufo) from a site far from the recipient locality and with very differenthabitat rapidly established a new population where three attempts with localanimals failed. After 10 years, the new population retained allele frequency distributionsat microsatellite loci almost the same as the donor site, whereas majorhistocompatibility complex allele frequencies changed to resemble local ones.Variations in phenology and climate could not readily explain the success of thedistant translocation source. We postulate that success was due to the very largesize of the donor population compared with local sources, implying that highlevels of mean fitness or adaptive variation can be more important than localfactors when considering translocations, at least in some circumstances.",
keywords = "translocation, amphibian, genetics, phenology, donor population size",
author = "Inga Zeisset and T.J.C. Beebee",
note = "{\circledC} 2012 The Zoological Society of London",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acv.12003",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "359--366",
journal = "Animal Conservation",
issn = "1367-9430",
number = "3",

}

Donor population size rather than local adaptation can be a key determinant of amphibian translocation success. / Zeisset, Inga; Beebee, T.J.C.

In: Animal Conservation, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.06.2013, p. 359-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Donor population size rather than local adaptation can be a key determinant of amphibian translocation success

AU - Zeisset, Inga

AU - Beebee, T.J.C.

N1 - © 2012 The Zoological Society of London

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Translocation of species to new locations is a widespread procedure in conservationbiology. Conventional wisdom suggests using large numbers of donor stockfrom sites as close and as ecologically similar to the recipient location as possibleto minimise risks from maladaptation and outbreeding depression. Here, wecompare translocation success to a common receptor site of animals from a largebut distant population with those from smaller proximal populations. Commontoads (Bufo bufo) from a site far from the recipient locality and with very differenthabitat rapidly established a new population where three attempts with localanimals failed. After 10 years, the new population retained allele frequency distributionsat microsatellite loci almost the same as the donor site, whereas majorhistocompatibility complex allele frequencies changed to resemble local ones.Variations in phenology and climate could not readily explain the success of thedistant translocation source. We postulate that success was due to the very largesize of the donor population compared with local sources, implying that highlevels of mean fitness or adaptive variation can be more important than localfactors when considering translocations, at least in some circumstances.

AB - Translocation of species to new locations is a widespread procedure in conservationbiology. Conventional wisdom suggests using large numbers of donor stockfrom sites as close and as ecologically similar to the recipient location as possibleto minimise risks from maladaptation and outbreeding depression. Here, wecompare translocation success to a common receptor site of animals from a largebut distant population with those from smaller proximal populations. Commontoads (Bufo bufo) from a site far from the recipient locality and with very differenthabitat rapidly established a new population where three attempts with localanimals failed. After 10 years, the new population retained allele frequency distributionsat microsatellite loci almost the same as the donor site, whereas majorhistocompatibility complex allele frequencies changed to resemble local ones.Variations in phenology and climate could not readily explain the success of thedistant translocation source. We postulate that success was due to the very largesize of the donor population compared with local sources, implying that highlevels of mean fitness or adaptive variation can be more important than localfactors when considering translocations, at least in some circumstances.

KW - translocation

KW - amphibian

KW - genetics

KW - phenology

KW - donor population size

U2 - 10.1111/acv.12003

DO - 10.1111/acv.12003

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 359

EP - 366

JO - Animal Conservation

JF - Animal Conservation

SN - 1367-9430

IS - 3

ER -