Do monkeys like elephants or do elephants watch monkeys? An empirical study into the default reading of constraint diagrams

Andrew Fish, Judith Masthoff

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

Constraint diagrams complement the Unified Modeling Language that is used in the development of software systems. They generalize Venn and Euler diagrams, and include facilities for quantification and navigation of relations. Difficulties such as ordering quantifiers cause constraint diagrams to have more than one possible meaning. Fish et al. have extended the constraint diagram notation, augmenting it with a reading tree which provides a unique semantics. However, this involves extracting extra information about the reading order from the diagram creator. Progress has been made towards a default reading, which extracts this information implicitly from the diagram. In this paper, we investigate how humans read ambiguous constraint diagrams intuitively, without any instructions on the reading order. We test several principles which could be used in a default reading. We conclude that although some of these principles have significant effects, they also may conflict. Either an explicit reading tree or a taught method of reading a diagram which may conflict with some people’s intuition is necessary.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of Brighton
Place of PublicationBrighton, UK
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2005

Fingerprint

intuition
quantification
semantics
instruction
cause
software

Bibliographical note

© University of Brighton. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder.

Keywords

  • Constraint diagrams
  • Diagrammatic reasoning

Cite this

@misc{5ba168d635304bfa9ac522892b72d4ff,
title = "Do monkeys like elephants or do elephants watch monkeys? An empirical study into the default reading of constraint diagrams",
abstract = "Constraint diagrams complement the Unified Modeling Language that is used in the development of software systems. They generalize Venn and Euler diagrams, and include facilities for quantification and navigation of relations. Difficulties such as ordering quantifiers cause constraint diagrams to have more than one possible meaning. Fish et al. have extended the constraint diagram notation, augmenting it with a reading tree which provides a unique semantics. However, this involves extracting extra information about the reading order from the diagram creator. Progress has been made towards a default reading, which extracts this information implicitly from the diagram. In this paper, we investigate how humans read ambiguous constraint diagrams intuitively, without any instructions on the reading order. We test several principles which could be used in a default reading. We conclude that although some of these principles have significant effects, they also may conflict. Either an explicit reading tree or a taught method of reading a diagram which may conflict with some people’s intuition is necessary.",
keywords = "Constraint diagrams, Diagrammatic reasoning",
author = "Andrew Fish and Judith Masthoff",
note = "{\circledC} University of Brighton. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder.",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
publisher = "University of Brighton",
type = "Other",

}

Do monkeys like elephants or do elephants watch monkeys? An empirical study into the default reading of constraint diagrams. / Fish, Andrew; Masthoff, Judith.

Brighton, UK : University of Brighton. 2005, .

Research output: Other contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Do monkeys like elephants or do elephants watch monkeys? An empirical study into the default reading of constraint diagrams

AU - Fish, Andrew

AU - Masthoff, Judith

N1 - © University of Brighton. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Constraint diagrams complement the Unified Modeling Language that is used in the development of software systems. They generalize Venn and Euler diagrams, and include facilities for quantification and navigation of relations. Difficulties such as ordering quantifiers cause constraint diagrams to have more than one possible meaning. Fish et al. have extended the constraint diagram notation, augmenting it with a reading tree which provides a unique semantics. However, this involves extracting extra information about the reading order from the diagram creator. Progress has been made towards a default reading, which extracts this information implicitly from the diagram. In this paper, we investigate how humans read ambiguous constraint diagrams intuitively, without any instructions on the reading order. We test several principles which could be used in a default reading. We conclude that although some of these principles have significant effects, they also may conflict. Either an explicit reading tree or a taught method of reading a diagram which may conflict with some people’s intuition is necessary.

AB - Constraint diagrams complement the Unified Modeling Language that is used in the development of software systems. They generalize Venn and Euler diagrams, and include facilities for quantification and navigation of relations. Difficulties such as ordering quantifiers cause constraint diagrams to have more than one possible meaning. Fish et al. have extended the constraint diagram notation, augmenting it with a reading tree which provides a unique semantics. However, this involves extracting extra information about the reading order from the diagram creator. Progress has been made towards a default reading, which extracts this information implicitly from the diagram. In this paper, we investigate how humans read ambiguous constraint diagrams intuitively, without any instructions on the reading order. We test several principles which could be used in a default reading. We conclude that although some of these principles have significant effects, they also may conflict. Either an explicit reading tree or a taught method of reading a diagram which may conflict with some people’s intuition is necessary.

KW - Constraint diagrams

KW - Diagrammatic reasoning

M3 - Other contribution

PB - University of Brighton

CY - Brighton, UK

ER -