Abstract
The authors present a discourse analysis of an influential paper on the experience of
electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). By focusing on how patients are construed in this article, they deconstruct theways in which the case for ECTas ‘helpful and not particularly
frightening’ is made. They argue that, as with all academic writing, a discourse of scientific
objectivity can be used to privilege certain views and promote certain interests.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 189-203 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice |
Volume | 78 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2005 |