Demand for offsetting and insetting in the EU Emissions Trading System

Timothy Laing, Misato Sato, Marta Ciszewska

Research output: Working paperResearch

Abstract

International carbon offsetting can help reduce compliance costs in emissions trading schemes and at the same time support carbon mitigation projects in developing countries. A surprising observation from the European Union Emissions Trading System's experience with offsetting is that companies do not fully utilise offsetting for compliance despite the cost advantage in doing so. However, so far ther ehas been limited research evaluating what factors influence companies' decisions to utilise offsets. This paper fills this gap by investigating the demand for carbon offsets in tradable permit emissions markets. To do so, we use detailed firm-level data on 279 companies regulated under the EU ETS during 2008-2012.Our findings suggest that there are clear sectoral differences and that, contrary to expectations, transaction costs and over-allocation of free allowances are not the key determining factors. We find some evidence to support the existence of ‘insetting', that is, companies with subsidiaries in key offset countries are more likely to use a larger share of their offset allowance for compliance. Semi-structured interviews with companies supported these findings.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016

Fingerprint

Emissions trading
Carbon
Trading systems
Mitigation
European Union
Structured interview
Transaction costs
Emissions trading scheme
Factors
Developing countries
Tradable emission permits
Compliance costs
Firm-level data
Influence factors
Subsidiaries
Costs

Cite this

@techreport{215f12310bdd4d929fe50b4c7c80ddb5,
title = "Demand for offsetting and insetting in the EU Emissions Trading System",
abstract = "International carbon offsetting can help reduce compliance costs in emissions trading schemes and at the same time support carbon mitigation projects in developing countries. A surprising observation from the European Union Emissions Trading System's experience with offsetting is that companies do not fully utilise offsetting for compliance despite the cost advantage in doing so. However, so far ther ehas been limited research evaluating what factors influence companies' decisions to utilise offsets. This paper fills this gap by investigating the demand for carbon offsets in tradable permit emissions markets. To do so, we use detailed firm-level data on 279 companies regulated under the EU ETS during 2008-2012.Our findings suggest that there are clear sectoral differences and that, contrary to expectations, transaction costs and over-allocation of free allowances are not the key determining factors. We find some evidence to support the existence of ‘insetting', that is, companies with subsidiaries in key offset countries are more likely to use a larger share of their offset allowance for compliance. Semi-structured interviews with companies supported these findings.",
author = "Timothy Laing and Misato Sato and Marta Ciszewska",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Demand for offsetting and insetting in the EU Emissions Trading System. / Laing, Timothy; Sato, Misato; Ciszewska, Marta.

2016.

Research output: Working paperResearch

TY - UNPB

T1 - Demand for offsetting and insetting in the EU Emissions Trading System

AU - Laing, Timothy

AU - Sato, Misato

AU - Ciszewska, Marta

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - International carbon offsetting can help reduce compliance costs in emissions trading schemes and at the same time support carbon mitigation projects in developing countries. A surprising observation from the European Union Emissions Trading System's experience with offsetting is that companies do not fully utilise offsetting for compliance despite the cost advantage in doing so. However, so far ther ehas been limited research evaluating what factors influence companies' decisions to utilise offsets. This paper fills this gap by investigating the demand for carbon offsets in tradable permit emissions markets. To do so, we use detailed firm-level data on 279 companies regulated under the EU ETS during 2008-2012.Our findings suggest that there are clear sectoral differences and that, contrary to expectations, transaction costs and over-allocation of free allowances are not the key determining factors. We find some evidence to support the existence of ‘insetting', that is, companies with subsidiaries in key offset countries are more likely to use a larger share of their offset allowance for compliance. Semi-structured interviews with companies supported these findings.

AB - International carbon offsetting can help reduce compliance costs in emissions trading schemes and at the same time support carbon mitigation projects in developing countries. A surprising observation from the European Union Emissions Trading System's experience with offsetting is that companies do not fully utilise offsetting for compliance despite the cost advantage in doing so. However, so far ther ehas been limited research evaluating what factors influence companies' decisions to utilise offsets. This paper fills this gap by investigating the demand for carbon offsets in tradable permit emissions markets. To do so, we use detailed firm-level data on 279 companies regulated under the EU ETS during 2008-2012.Our findings suggest that there are clear sectoral differences and that, contrary to expectations, transaction costs and over-allocation of free allowances are not the key determining factors. We find some evidence to support the existence of ‘insetting', that is, companies with subsidiaries in key offset countries are more likely to use a larger share of their offset allowance for compliance. Semi-structured interviews with companies supported these findings.

M3 - Working paper

BT - Demand for offsetting and insetting in the EU Emissions Trading System

ER -