The potential for developing the participatory dimensions of the Ecosystem Approach are examined through the work of Habermas to guide the design of Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation (DDMV) and elicit social willingness to pay. DDMV is contrasted with Deliberated Preferences approaches, which are a deliberative adaptation of stated preference techniques and comprise almost all Deliberative Monetary Valuation studies so far. In a detailed case study where coastal and marine cultural ecosystem services were set within a broader societal context, DDMV was undertaken through three iterative workshops involving a single group of participants representing local residents and different interests across the public, private and third sectors. The use of DDMV generates insights into its potential for securing a socially sustainable route to environmental management: sustainable development that brings together values for ecosystem services with other social priorities, is more inclusive of diverse user needs and values, and is sensitive to issues of environmental justice. As well as highlighting the benefits and challenges that a more democratic deliberative valuation presents, we highlight the practical strengths and vulnerabilities of this approach and indicate directions for further methodological evolution of DDMV.
Bibliographical note© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).
- Shared values
- Deliberative monetary valuation
- Deliberative democracy
- Communicative rationality
- Environmental justice
- Cultural ecosystem services
- Vice-Chancellor's Office - Associate PVC Research and Enterprise
- Centre for Aquatic Environments
- Centre for Spatial, Environmental and Cultural Politics
- Society, Space and Environment Research and Enterprise Group
- Tourism, Hospitality and Events Research and Enterprise Group
Orchard-Webb, J., Kenter, J., Bryce, R., & Church, A. (2016). Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach. Ecosystem Services, 21(B), 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.005