Defending academic freedom: Arts and Humanities research as constrained writing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article notes that while there is a large literature lamenting increasing assaults on academic freedom, there is little literature to address ways in which it might be preserved. Sampling that writing, it finds some concern with protecting academic freedom in extreme scenarios, via discrete programmes, and generalised dissidence, but no discussion of determinate action applicable to all Arts and Humanities research. Defining academic freedom via the UK’s legal framework and elaboration in Judith Butler’s writing, the article inventorises significant assaults in recent times, noting the roles of government and the market in such. Following the literature review, it proposes a new, interventionist tactic for preserving academic freedom, suggesting that undue constraints should be annotated when research is written up, and that this space should also be used to suggest constructive alternatives. This strategy is demonstrated as the article acknowledges some of the constraints on its own production and suggests redress.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArts and Humanities in Higher Education
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

art
assault
tactics
scenario
market
literature
time

Bibliographical note

Mary Anne Francis, Defending academic freedom: Arts and Humanities research as constrained writing, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/1474022218811617

Keywords

  • Academic freedom
  • universities’ autonomy
  • Judith Butler
  • Stefan Collini
  • government and market incursions
  • Prevent
  • REF
  • TEF
  • intervention
  • positive and negative critique
  • art as research
  • footnotes/the parergon as resistance
  • Arts and Humanities research

Cite this

@article{35dfdb18c77b45ee92040cb4d2170eb5,
title = "Defending academic freedom: Arts and Humanities research as constrained writing",
abstract = "This article notes that while there is a large literature lamenting increasing assaults on academic freedom, there is little literature to address ways in which it might be preserved. Sampling that writing, it finds some concern with protecting academic freedom in extreme scenarios, via discrete programmes, and generalised dissidence, but no discussion of determinate action applicable to all Arts and Humanities research. Defining academic freedom via the UK’s legal framework and elaboration in Judith Butler’s writing, the article inventorises significant assaults in recent times, noting the roles of government and the market in such. Following the literature review, it proposes a new, interventionist tactic for preserving academic freedom, suggesting that undue constraints should be annotated when research is written up, and that this space should also be used to suggest constructive alternatives. This strategy is demonstrated as the article acknowledges some of the constraints on its own production and suggests redress.",
keywords = "Academic freedom, universities’ autonomy, Judith Butler, Stefan Collini, government and market incursions, Prevent, REF, TEF, intervention, positive and negative critique, art as research, footnotes/the parergon as resistance, Arts and Humanities research",
author = "Francis, {Mary Anne}",
note = "Mary Anne Francis, Defending academic freedom: Arts and Humanities research as constrained writing, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, Copyright {\circledC} 2018 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/1474022218811617",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1177/1474022218811617",
language = "English",
journal = "Arts and Humanities in Higher Education",
issn = "1474-0222",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defending academic freedom

T2 - Arts and Humanities research as constrained writing

AU - Francis, Mary Anne

N1 - Mary Anne Francis, Defending academic freedom: Arts and Humanities research as constrained writing, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/1474022218811617

PY - 2018/11/19

Y1 - 2018/11/19

N2 - This article notes that while there is a large literature lamenting increasing assaults on academic freedom, there is little literature to address ways in which it might be preserved. Sampling that writing, it finds some concern with protecting academic freedom in extreme scenarios, via discrete programmes, and generalised dissidence, but no discussion of determinate action applicable to all Arts and Humanities research. Defining academic freedom via the UK’s legal framework and elaboration in Judith Butler’s writing, the article inventorises significant assaults in recent times, noting the roles of government and the market in such. Following the literature review, it proposes a new, interventionist tactic for preserving academic freedom, suggesting that undue constraints should be annotated when research is written up, and that this space should also be used to suggest constructive alternatives. This strategy is demonstrated as the article acknowledges some of the constraints on its own production and suggests redress.

AB - This article notes that while there is a large literature lamenting increasing assaults on academic freedom, there is little literature to address ways in which it might be preserved. Sampling that writing, it finds some concern with protecting academic freedom in extreme scenarios, via discrete programmes, and generalised dissidence, but no discussion of determinate action applicable to all Arts and Humanities research. Defining academic freedom via the UK’s legal framework and elaboration in Judith Butler’s writing, the article inventorises significant assaults in recent times, noting the roles of government and the market in such. Following the literature review, it proposes a new, interventionist tactic for preserving academic freedom, suggesting that undue constraints should be annotated when research is written up, and that this space should also be used to suggest constructive alternatives. This strategy is demonstrated as the article acknowledges some of the constraints on its own production and suggests redress.

KW - Academic freedom

KW - universities’ autonomy

KW - Judith Butler

KW - Stefan Collini

KW - government and market incursions

KW - Prevent

KW - REF

KW - TEF

KW - intervention

KW - positive and negative critique

KW - art as research

KW - footnotes/the parergon as resistance

KW - Arts and Humanities research

U2 - 10.1177/1474022218811617

DO - 10.1177/1474022218811617

M3 - Article

JO - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education

JF - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education

SN - 1474-0222

ER -