Abstract
The idea of instantly and efficiently sharing data amongst scientists has been promoted by Lab Management Apps (LMAs). These apps promise to recreate an idealisedface-to-facecommunity of interaction,allowing(1) moreefficient communication, and(2) virtual extension ofthe community.Against the background of this idealised image of knowledge sharing, I present ethnographic research that examines how lab members perform careful community management, to maintain the specific image of community defined by the LMA. Lab members allowed non-scientists to contribute to theirresearchnetworkbut not to jointhe imagined/imposed community. I argue thatthe politics of exclusion must be questionedin such cases.Writing an app for an imagined scientific community requires processes of in/exclusion to be codified, which can be disruptive to the community. At the same time, this can be a critically productive process that makes visible inequities that have otherwise been ideologically suppressed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2016 |
| Event | MECCSA Annual Conference 2016 - Canterbury Christchurch University, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom Duration: 4 Jan 2016 → 10 Jul 2019 |
Conference
| Conference | MECCSA Annual Conference 2016 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Canterbury, Kent |
| Period | 4/01/16 → 10/07/19 |
Keywords
- ethnography
- lab apps
- media
- Technology
- community
- communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contributing, But Not Belonging: Lab apps and the politics of exclusion from communities of expertise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver