Abstract
Social design has emerged as a broad set of designerly approaches to societal challenges. With falling public sector budgets and failing economies, social design, as carried through pro- fessional, consultant practices rather than in its voluntarist or activist modes, is understood to work as a smart, fast way of seeing us through these. Outsourcing, Outcome-Based Budgeting and the stirring up of traditional governance systems and responsibilities each contribute to a more varied and less permanent design landscape to work in, however. These are met by a set of design methods to researching, generating and realising new ways to configure and deliver services. This paper takes a critical view that asks whether consultant social design really is ‘social’ or whether, instead, it conspires, in its methods and in the contexts it is active in, towards the opposite.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 813-821 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | City |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 25 Jan 2018 |
Bibliographical note
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in City on 25/01/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13604813.2017.1412203Keywords
- design
- austerity
- citizenry
- service delivery
- Social class
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consultant social design, austerity and citizenry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver