Co-operative work and developmental freedom: A study of four British worker co-operatives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article presents an empirical study of four worker co-operatives in the UK to assess their potential in delivering freedom in working life. It discusses developmental freedom in terms of control in static, dynamic and constant timeframes, considers the compatibility of co-operative institutions in capitalism and presents findings from previous studies. This article draws on these cases to argue that even under capitalism, the co-operative structure can provide sources of control over working life for individuals through collective, democratic management and effective autonomy over working time. It is suggested that worker control in co-operatives does not come at the cost of financial viability. Weaknesses of the model, especially low pay and long hours, are also raised. In conclusion, co-operatives are suggested to be an effective vehicle for developmental freedom but must do so alongside other institutions supportive of control over working life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-34
Number of pages34
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Keywords

  • co-operatives
  • developmental freedom
  • market socialism
  • worker ownership
  • working life
  • workplace democracy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Co-operative work and developmental freedom: A study of four British worker co-operatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this