Capturing the value of flexibility in public sector capital investment projects: Evidence from New Zealand local government organisations

Ali Elharidy, Zahir Ahmed, Deryl Northcott, Kristine Fu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Capital investment projects with inherent flexibility provide valuable options for responding to changes in the business environment. While conventional investment appraisal methods fail to capture the value of this flexibility, real options analysis (ROA) has been proposed as a useful alternative, despite being challenging to implement. This study examines how project flexibility is considered in practice. It focuses on local government organisations (LGOs), which typically have significant capital investment programmes that need to be responsive to changing operating conditions. A questionnaire (mailed to the financial directors of New Zealand LGOs) was combined with follow-up interviews to facilitate data triangulation.The findings reveal that LGO managers recognize the value of project flexibility and take it into account to some extent. However, there was no evidence that formal ROA procedures are used in practice. These findings are of relevance to financial decision-makers concerned with assessing capital investment projects in the public sector.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages23
JournalNew Zealand Journal of Applied Business Research
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Capital investment
  • real options analysis
  • flexibility
  • public sector
  • local government organisations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Capturing the value of flexibility in public sector capital investment projects: Evidence from New Zealand local government organisations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this