Breadcrumbing by a dating partner, perceived social support, and paranoia

Rusi Jaspal, Barbara Lopes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Breadcrumbing is an abusive dating behavior that involves sending non-comital signals to another person and feigning interest in them, despite having no intention of taking the relationship forward. Exposure to breadcrumbing has been found to be harmful for mental health but there is no research into its relationship with more severe psychopathology, such as paranoid ideation. This study examines the relationship between exposure to breadcrumbing and paranoid ideation through the mediation of perceived social support, while controlling for the effects of age and sex. An Advanced Mediation Generalized Linear Model was built based on cross-sectional correlational survey data from 544 participants in the United Kingdom. Exposure to breadcrumbing was indirectly associated with paranoid ideation through the mediation of perceived social support. Sex impacted perceived social support, with men reporting lower perceived social support. Age impacted paranoid ideation, with younger participants reporting higher paranoid ideation. The results suggest that more frequent exposure to breadcrumbing from current or past dating partners may result in a perception of lower social support from others which in turn increases the risk of paranoid ideation. Psychological interventions should focus on enabling clients to develop and retain connections with others to access social support in the face of breadcrumbing.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • Breadcrumbing
  • dating violence
  • paranoia
  • perceived social support
  • relationships

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breadcrumbing by a dating partner, perceived social support, and paranoia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this