Biomechanical testing of fixed and adjustable femoral cortical suspension devices for ACL reconstruction under high loads and extended cyclic loading

Sarvpreet Singh, Sonia Ramos-Pascual, Kinga Czerbak, Muzaffar Malik, Peter J. Schranz, Anthony W. Miles, Vipul Mandalia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To compare loop elongation after 5000 cycles, loop-elongation at failure, and load at failure of the fixed-loop G-Lok device and three adjustable-loop devices (UltraButton, RigidLoop Adjustable and ProCinch RT), during testing over extended cycles under high loading. Methods: Five devices of each type were tested on a custom-built rig fixed to an Instron machine. The testing protocol had four stages: preloading, cyclic preconditioning, incremental cyclic loading and pull-to-failure. Outcome measures were loop elongation after 5000 cycles, loop-elongation at failure, and load at failure. Results: The loop elongation after 5000 cycles for G-Lok was 1.46 ± 0.25 mm, which was comparable to that of RigidLoop (1.51 ± 0.16 mm, p = 1.000) and ProCinch (1.60 ± 0.09 mm, p = 1.000). In comparison, the loop elongation for UltraButton was 2.66 ± 0.28 mm, which was significantly larger than all other devices (p = 0.048). The failure load for all devices ranged between 1455 and 2178 N. G-Lok was significantly stronger than all adjustable-loop devices (p = 0.048). The elongation at failure was largest for UltraButton (4.20 ± 0.33 mm), which was significantly greater than G-Lok (3.17 ± 0.33 mm, p = 0.048), RigidLoop (2.88 ± 0.20 mm, p = 0.048) and ProCinch (2.78 ± 0.08 mm, p = 0.048). There was no significant difference in elongation at failure for the rest of the devices. Conclusions: Our study has shown that the G-Lok fixed-loop device and the three adjustable-loop devices (UltraButton, RigidLoop Adjustable and ProCinch RT) all elongated less than 3 mm during testing over an extended number of cycles at high loads, nonetheless, the fixed loop device performed best in terms of least elongation and highest load at failure.

Original languageEnglish
Article number27
JournalJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2020

Keywords

  • Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  • Fixed-loop femoral cortical suspension device
  • Adjustableloop femoral cortical suspension device
  • Biomechanical testing
  • High loads
  • Extended cyclic loading
  • Adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspension device

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Biomechanical testing of fixed and adjustable femoral cortical suspension devices for ACL reconstruction under high loads and extended cyclic loading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Singh, S., Ramos-Pascual, S., Czerbak, K., Malik, M., Schranz, P. J., Miles, A. W., & Mandalia, V. (2020). Biomechanical testing of fixed and adjustable femoral cortical suspension devices for ACL reconstruction under high loads and extended cyclic loading. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 7(1), [27]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00235-9