Below decks on the flagship: evaluating youth justice

Lynda Measor, Peter Squires

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapter

Abstract

This chapter considers some of the dangers of national, centrally-driven evaluations, arguing that the main reason why evaluations cannot explain what works is their relative neglect of the perspectives and experiences of the central actors. It focuses on the connection between ‘the new and quasi-scientific language of programme evaluation’ and the ‘actuarial-interventionist logic of contemporary youth justice’. It shows the ways in which evaluation becomes more a part of a process by which compliance with programme goals can be assured than a scientific attempt to assess the effectiveness of different strategies. It discusses how the Youth Justice Board and the Home Office were seeking clear evidence of the crime reduction that the youth offending flagship was intended to deliver.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation
EditorsDavid Taylor, Susan Balloch
Place of PublicationBristol, UK
PublisherThe Policy Press
Pages21-49
Number of pages29
ISBN (Print)1861346050
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

justice
evaluation
neglect
offense
language
evidence
experience

Cite this

Measor, L., & Squires, P. (2005). Below decks on the flagship: evaluating youth justice. In D. Taylor, & S. Balloch (Eds.), The politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation (pp. 21-49). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Measor, Lynda ; Squires, Peter. / Below decks on the flagship: evaluating youth justice. The politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation. editor / David Taylor ; Susan Balloch. Bristol, UK : The Policy Press, 2005. pp. 21-49
@inbook{797ac6fb30c94c0e9e5c6602e0d9317b,
title = "Below decks on the flagship: evaluating youth justice",
abstract = "This chapter considers some of the dangers of national, centrally-driven evaluations, arguing that the main reason why evaluations cannot explain what works is their relative neglect of the perspectives and experiences of the central actors. It focuses on the connection between ‘the new and quasi-scientific language of programme evaluation’ and the ‘actuarial-interventionist logic of contemporary youth justice’. It shows the ways in which evaluation becomes more a part of a process by which compliance with programme goals can be assured than a scientific attempt to assess the effectiveness of different strategies. It discusses how the Youth Justice Board and the Home Office were seeking clear evidence of the crime reduction that the youth offending flagship was intended to deliver.",
author = "Lynda Measor and Peter Squires",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "1861346050",
pages = "21--49",
editor = "David Taylor and Susan Balloch",
booktitle = "The politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation",
publisher = "The Policy Press",

}

Measor, L & Squires, P 2005, Below decks on the flagship: evaluating youth justice. in D Taylor & S Balloch (eds), The politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation. The Policy Press, Bristol, UK, pp. 21-49.

Below decks on the flagship: evaluating youth justice. / Measor, Lynda; Squires, Peter.

The politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation. ed. / David Taylor; Susan Balloch. Bristol, UK : The Policy Press, 2005. p. 21-49.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Below decks on the flagship: evaluating youth justice

AU - Measor, Lynda

AU - Squires, Peter

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This chapter considers some of the dangers of national, centrally-driven evaluations, arguing that the main reason why evaluations cannot explain what works is their relative neglect of the perspectives and experiences of the central actors. It focuses on the connection between ‘the new and quasi-scientific language of programme evaluation’ and the ‘actuarial-interventionist logic of contemporary youth justice’. It shows the ways in which evaluation becomes more a part of a process by which compliance with programme goals can be assured than a scientific attempt to assess the effectiveness of different strategies. It discusses how the Youth Justice Board and the Home Office were seeking clear evidence of the crime reduction that the youth offending flagship was intended to deliver.

AB - This chapter considers some of the dangers of national, centrally-driven evaluations, arguing that the main reason why evaluations cannot explain what works is their relative neglect of the perspectives and experiences of the central actors. It focuses on the connection between ‘the new and quasi-scientific language of programme evaluation’ and the ‘actuarial-interventionist logic of contemporary youth justice’. It shows the ways in which evaluation becomes more a part of a process by which compliance with programme goals can be assured than a scientific attempt to assess the effectiveness of different strategies. It discusses how the Youth Justice Board and the Home Office were seeking clear evidence of the crime reduction that the youth offending flagship was intended to deliver.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 1861346050

SP - 21

EP - 49

BT - The politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation

A2 - Taylor, David

A2 - Balloch, Susan

PB - The Policy Press

CY - Bristol, UK

ER -

Measor L, Squires P. Below decks on the flagship: evaluating youth justice. In Taylor D, Balloch S, editors, The politics of evaluation: participation and policy implementation. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press. 2005. p. 21-49