Attributing responsibility for energy justice: A case study of the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex

Kirsten Jenkins, Darren McCauley, Charles Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since 2006, as part of the transition to low-carbon technologies, UK energy policy has moved towards incentivising new nuclear power production. As a result, the UK has developed a (now delayed) strategy to deliver around 16GW of new nuclear power by 2030. This policy context provides an opportunity to reflect not only on the material infrastructure needed to meet transition targets, but also on who is responsible for the energy justice implications of these decisions. Using data collected from 26 semi-structured interviews with NGO and policy representatives, this paper presents a case study of energy justice concerns surrounding the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex in Somerset, focusing particularly on the highly controversial Hinkley Point C developments. The results emphasise the importance of considering not only instances of energy justice or injustice, but of attributing responsibility for them, a concept that has been largely overlooked in the energy justice literature. NGOs, government and business allocate responsibility differently in nuclear energy decision-making. We find that perceptions of responsibility are highly dependent upon the level of transparency in decision-making. This article is part of a Virtual Special Issue entitled ‘Exploring the Energy Justice Nexus’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)836-843
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume108
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2017

Fingerprint

justice
energy
responsibility
nuclear power
non-governmental organization
decision making
nuclear energy
energy policy
transparency
infrastructure
interview

Bibliographical note

© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Cite this

Jenkins, Kirsten ; McCauley, Darren ; Warren, Charles. / Attributing responsibility for energy justice: A case study of the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex. In: Energy Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 108. pp. 836-843.
@article{4b3192839b4a408ca512429433410a15,
title = "Attributing responsibility for energy justice: A case study of the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex",
abstract = "Since 2006, as part of the transition to low-carbon technologies, UK energy policy has moved towards incentivising new nuclear power production. As a result, the UK has developed a (now delayed) strategy to deliver around 16GW of new nuclear power by 2030. This policy context provides an opportunity to reflect not only on the material infrastructure needed to meet transition targets, but also on who is responsible for the energy justice implications of these decisions. Using data collected from 26 semi-structured interviews with NGO and policy representatives, this paper presents a case study of energy justice concerns surrounding the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex in Somerset, focusing particularly on the highly controversial Hinkley Point C developments. The results emphasise the importance of considering not only instances of energy justice or injustice, but of attributing responsibility for them, a concept that has been largely overlooked in the energy justice literature. NGOs, government and business allocate responsibility differently in nuclear energy decision-making. We find that perceptions of responsibility are highly dependent upon the level of transparency in decision-making. This article is part of a Virtual Special Issue entitled ‘Exploring the Energy Justice Nexus’.",
author = "Kirsten Jenkins and Darren McCauley and Charles Warren",
note = "{\circledC} 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.049",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "836--843",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",

}

Attributing responsibility for energy justice: A case study of the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex. / Jenkins, Kirsten; McCauley, Darren; Warren, Charles.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 108, 30.05.2017, p. 836-843.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attributing responsibility for energy justice: A case study of the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex

AU - Jenkins, Kirsten

AU - McCauley, Darren

AU - Warren, Charles

N1 - © 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2017/5/30

Y1 - 2017/5/30

N2 - Since 2006, as part of the transition to low-carbon technologies, UK energy policy has moved towards incentivising new nuclear power production. As a result, the UK has developed a (now delayed) strategy to deliver around 16GW of new nuclear power by 2030. This policy context provides an opportunity to reflect not only on the material infrastructure needed to meet transition targets, but also on who is responsible for the energy justice implications of these decisions. Using data collected from 26 semi-structured interviews with NGO and policy representatives, this paper presents a case study of energy justice concerns surrounding the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex in Somerset, focusing particularly on the highly controversial Hinkley Point C developments. The results emphasise the importance of considering not only instances of energy justice or injustice, but of attributing responsibility for them, a concept that has been largely overlooked in the energy justice literature. NGOs, government and business allocate responsibility differently in nuclear energy decision-making. We find that perceptions of responsibility are highly dependent upon the level of transparency in decision-making. This article is part of a Virtual Special Issue entitled ‘Exploring the Energy Justice Nexus’.

AB - Since 2006, as part of the transition to low-carbon technologies, UK energy policy has moved towards incentivising new nuclear power production. As a result, the UK has developed a (now delayed) strategy to deliver around 16GW of new nuclear power by 2030. This policy context provides an opportunity to reflect not only on the material infrastructure needed to meet transition targets, but also on who is responsible for the energy justice implications of these decisions. Using data collected from 26 semi-structured interviews with NGO and policy representatives, this paper presents a case study of energy justice concerns surrounding the Hinkley Point Nuclear Complex in Somerset, focusing particularly on the highly controversial Hinkley Point C developments. The results emphasise the importance of considering not only instances of energy justice or injustice, but of attributing responsibility for them, a concept that has been largely overlooked in the energy justice literature. NGOs, government and business allocate responsibility differently in nuclear energy decision-making. We find that perceptions of responsibility are highly dependent upon the level of transparency in decision-making. This article is part of a Virtual Special Issue entitled ‘Exploring the Energy Justice Nexus’.

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.049

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.049

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 836

EP - 843

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -