Abstract
This paper seeks to introduce and analyse the development of the Gradient Evaluation Framework (GEF) to facilitate evaluation of policy actions for their current or future use in terms of their ‘gradient friendliness’. In particular, this means their potential to level-up the gradient in health inequalities by addressing the social determinants of health and thereby reducing decision-makers' chances of error when developing such policy actions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 246-253 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Public health |
Volume | 128 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Jan 2014 |
Bibliographical note
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Public Health. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Public Health, 128:3 (2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.11.011Keywords
- health inequalities
- public health policy
- interventions
- health gradient
- evaluation
- health promotion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing public health approaches to level-up the gradient in health inequalities: the Gradient Evaluation Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Nigel Sherriff
- School of Education, Sport and Health - Prof of Public Health and Health Promotion
- Public Health and Health Conditions Research Excellence Group
- Centre for Arts and Wellbeing
- Centre for Transforming Sexuality and Gender
Person: Academic